GKB LENS PVT. LTD.,KOLKATA vs. D.C.I.T., CIRCLE - 5(1), KOLKATA
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that advertisement and sales promotion expenses are recurring in nature and are necessary for sustaining business in a competitive market. It noted that similar expenses were allowed in previous years by the revenue.
What were the facts?
The assessee claimed advertisement and sales promotion expenses of ₹3,22,29,000/-. The AO disallowed these expenses, treating them as capital expenditure, and allowed depreciation. The CIT(A) upheld the AO's decision.
What were the issues?
Whether advertisement and sales promotion expenses are revenue or capital in nature, and whether the revenue can take a different stand in the current assessment year compared to previous years.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “B” BENCH, KOLKATA
Per Rajesh Kumar, AM:
This is an appeal preferred by the assessee against the order of the National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the “Ld. CIT(A)”] dated 26.05.2026 for the AY 2022-23. 2. The only issue raised in ground nos. 7 to 10 is against the confirmation of addition of ₹2,41,71,750/- by ld. CIT(A) as made by the AO after disallowing the total expenditure on advertisement, publicity and sales promotion of ₹3,22,29,000/- by capitalizing the same and allowing depreciation of ₹80,57,250/- thereon @ 25%. GKB Lens Pvt. ltd; A.Y. 2022-23
The facts in brief are that the assessee is engaged in the business of trading of optical frames, lens
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S. Middlex, Puri vs. Commnr. Of State Tax, Banijyakar Bhawan, CuttackOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Maa Sunadei Indane Gramin Vitrak, Nayagarh vs. Commissioner Of CT And GST, Cuttack, OdishaOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Sunanda Raul vs. The Commissioner Of Commercial Taxes And Goods Nad Services Tax, OdishaOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Zakir Hussain Ali Khan vs. Additional Commissioner (Appeals), BhubaneswarOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Manorama Nayak, Khorda vs. Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, CT And GST, Bhubaneswar Iv Circle, KhurdaOrissa · 14 Oct 2026