SUBIR ROY,KOLKATA vs. DCIT, CIRCLE 43, KOLKATA, KOLKATA
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the Assessing Officer failed to fulfill the conditions laid down under Section 147 for reopening the assessment, as the reasons recorded did not mention any failure on the part of the assessee to disclose material facts.
What were the facts?
The assessee's case was reopened for AY 2013-14, leading to an addition of Rs. 6,57,500/- under Section 50C. The CIT(A) dismissed the assessee's appeal against this addition.
What were the issues?
Whether the reopening of assessment under Section 147 was valid without establishing the assessee's failure to disclose material facts. Whether the addition under Section 50C was justified in the absence of valid reopening.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 147,Section 50C,Section 143(3),Section 148,Section 144,Section 144B,Section 250
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “SMC” BENCH,
Before: SHRI YOGESH KUMAR U.S. & SHRI GOPALAN GURUSAMY
PER YOGESH KUMAR U.S., JUDICIAL MEMBER:
This Appeal is filed by the Assessee against the order of the NFAC, Delhi (‘Ld. CIT(A)’ for short) dated 26.03.2026, passed u/s 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (“the Act”, for short) for the Assessment Year 2013-14. 2. Brief facts of the case are that, Assessee is an individual, filed return of income for the year under consideration declaring total income of Rs.14,43,423/-. The case was selected for scrutiny for the A.Y. 2013-14 and an Assessment Order came to be passed u/s 143(3) of the Act on 29.03.2016. The case of the Assessee was reopened and notice u/s 148 of the Act came to be issued on 31.03.2021 and an Subir Roy; A.Y: 2013-14 Assessment Order came to be passed
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 147
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Tarunaben Maganlal Bhut, Navagam vs ITO Ward 2(2)(1), RajkotITA 673/RJT/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Tvl. Jeyarani Shopping Centre vs. The Deputy State Tax Officer -1/The Deputy Commercial Tax OfficerMadras · 14 Oct 2026
- Rohan Tanna vs. Directorate General Of Goods And Services Tax IntelligenceChhattisgarh · 14 Oct 2026
- Dipak Saikia vs. The Union Of INDIA And 4 OrsGauhati · 14 Oct 2026
- Saraswati Phukan vs. The Union Of INDIA And 4 OrsGauhati · 14 Oct 2026
- Sanjay Maheshwari vs. Union Of INDIA & Ors.Delhi · 14 Oct 2026