MOONDHARA COMMERCIAL PRIVATE LIMITED,HOWRAH vs. ITO, WARD 13(1), KOLKATA, KOLKATA
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the notice issued under Section 148 on 27.07.2022 was beyond the limitation period, as per the Supreme Court's decision in Union of India vs. Rajeev Bansal. Therefore, the notice was quashed.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed its return of income for AY 2013-14. The case was reopened based on information about accommodation entries. A notice under Section 148 was issued on 27.07.2022, which the assessee argued was beyond the limitation period.
What were the issues?
Whether the notice issued under Section 148 for reassessment proceedings for AY 2013-14 was barred by limitation, considering the Supreme Court's ruling on the applicability of TOLA and the new regime for reassessment.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 148,Section 147,Section 144,Section 148A,Section 149
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “C” BENCH, KOLKATA
Per Rajesh Kumar, AM:
This is an appeal preferred by the assessee against the order of the National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the “Ld. CIT(A)”] dated 11.03.2026 for the AY 2013-14. 2. In ground no.2 the assessee has challenged the notice issued u/s 148 of the Act and re-assessment proceedings to be barred by limitation in view of the decision of Hon'ble Apex Bansal [2024] 469 ITR 46 (SC), dated 03.10.2024 and therefore, the notice u/s 148 of the Act as well as the assessment framed by the ld. AO are nullity and bad in law. Moondhara Commercial Private Limited; A.Y. 2013-14
The facts in
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 148
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
- Adj Agri International LLP, Rajkot vs The Income Tax Officer, Ward-1(1)(1), RajkotITA 1198/RJT/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Giri Paints vs. The Assistant Commissioner (St)Madras · 15 Oct 2026
- Rahul Radheshyam Chauhan vs. Union Of INDIA Thru The Sec. Ministry Of Law And Justice And OrsBombay · 15 Oct 2026
- S.Murugesan vs. The Deputy Commercial Tax OfficerMadras · 15 Oct 2026
- Tvl. Annai Garden vs. The Commercial Tax Officer / The State Tax OfficerMadras · 15 Oct 2026
- Yadeshwar Mallekedi vs. The State Of TelanganaTelangana · 15 Oct 2026