BYRAPURA GOWDE GOWDA DEEPU,BANGALORE vs. DCIT CENTRAL 3(1), BANGALORE
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the AO had conducted sufficient enquiries and applied his mind, making a substantial addition. The PCIT's disagreement with the extent of enquiry was not sufficient to revise the assessment order under Section 263.
What were the facts?
Following a search, the assessee's assessment for AY 2023-24 was completed with an increased income. The PCIT initiated revision proceedings under Section 263, citing inadequate enquiry by the AO regarding seized documents and transactions.
What were the issues?
Whether the PCIT correctly invoked Section 263 powers when the AO had conducted enquiries and made additions, and whether the assessment order was erroneous and prejudicial to revenue.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 263,Section 132,Section 143(3),Section 132(4),Section 131(1),Section 133(6)
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, BANGALORE BENCHES, BANGALORE
Before: SHRI WASEEM AHMED & SHRI SOUNDARARAJAN K.
PER SHRI WASEEM AHMED, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER:
The present appeal has been instituted by the assessee against the order of the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Bangalore (in short “Ld. PCIT”) passed under section 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short “Act”) for the assessment year 2023-24. 2. In the memo of appeal, the assessee has raised 1
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 263
- Gillette India Limited, Mumbai vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, JaipurITA 1316/JPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Neo Structo Construction P. Ltd., Ahmedabad vs The Pr. CIT- 3, AhmedabadITA 1216/AHD/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- Vimal Harilal Baldania, Gandhidham vs The ITO Ward 2, GandhidhamITA 770/RJT/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1493/KOL/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1492/KOL/2026[2013-2014]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2013-2014
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Utkal Highways, Bidanasi vs. Union Of INDIAOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- Pradeep Kumar Behera vs. Superintendent CGST And Central Excise., CuttackOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- Manas Behera vs. Commissioner, CT And GST Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- Pramod Kumar Nayak vs. Superintendent, CGST And Central Excise, KendraparaOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- Nirmal Kumar Sharma S/O Ram Swroop Sharma vs. Union Of INDIARajasthan · 16 Oct 2026