RUPIN KHANDUJA, BILASPUR,BILASPUR vs. ITO, WARD-1(1), BILASPUR, BILASPUR
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that issuing a notice with a shorter period than prescribed under Section 148 is a jurisdictional defect, making the notice invalid. Consequently, all reassessment proceedings based on such an invalid notice are null and void.
What were the facts?
The assessee received a notice under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, requiring them to furnish a return within 90 days from the date of issue. The assessee contended that this period was shorter than the mandatory three months from the end of the month of issue, as stipulated by the law.
What were the issues?
Whether a notice issued under Section 148 providing a shorter period than mandated by law for filing a return is a jurisdictional defect rendering the notice invalid.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, RAIPUR BENCH “SMC”, RAIPUR
Before: SHRI PARTHA SARATHI CHAUDHURY
PER PARTHA SARATHI CHAUDHURY, JM The present appeal preferred by the assessee emanates from the order of the Ld.CIT(Appeals)/NFAC, Delhi dated 15.07.2026 for the assessment year 2019-20 as per the grounds of appeal on record.
The contention in law raised by the assessee is as follows:
“1. In the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the notice issued u/s. 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 dated 22.04.2024 is void ab in
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 148
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
- Adj Agri International LLP, Rajkot vs The Income Tax Officer, Ward-1(1)(1), RajkotITA 1198/RJT/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Giri Paints vs. The Assistant Commissioner (St)Madras · 15 Oct 2026
- Rahul Radheshyam Chauhan vs. Union Of INDIA Thru The Sec. Ministry Of Law And Justice And OrsBombay · 15 Oct 2026
- S.Murugesan vs. The Deputy Commercial Tax OfficerMadras · 15 Oct 2026
- Tvl. Annai Garden vs. The Commercial Tax Officer / The State Tax OfficerMadras · 15 Oct 2026
- Yadeshwar Mallekedi vs. The State Of TelanganaTelangana · 15 Oct 2026