INCOME TAX OFFICER, CIVIL LINE, RAIPUR vs. RAIPUR DEVCON PVT. LTD., ANANDAM WORLD CITY
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the notice issued under Section 143(2) was time-barred and invalid, rendering the assessment void ab initio. The absence of a valid transfer order under Section 127 further invalidated the assessment proceedings.
What were the facts?
The Assessing Officer (AO) issued a notice under Section 143(2) beyond the prescribed time limit and without a valid transfer order under Section 127. The assessee's return was filed on September 1, 2015, making the deadline for the notice September 30, 2016, but it was issued on July 12, 2017.
What were the issues?
The key issues were the validity of the notice issued under Section 143(2) beyond the statutory time limit and the absence of a valid transfer order under Section 127, which are prerequisites for a valid assessment.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, RAIPUR BENCH, RAIPUR
Before: SHRI PARTHA SARATHI CHAUDHURY & SHRI AVDHESH KUMAR MISHRA
Heard together (2 matters)
Read from the judgment's own cause title. This page is filed under one of them.
PER PARTHA SARATHI CHAUDHURY, JM: The captioned appeal preferred by the Revenue and corresponding cross objection by the assessee emanates from the order of the Ld.CIT(Appeals)/NFAC, dated 17.10.2025 for the assessment year 2015-16 as per the grounds of appeal on record.
In this case the Ld. CIT(A) had provided relief to the assessee on the ground that the assessee filed its return of income on 01.09.2015. T
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 127
- Radhakishan Potharajula, Karim Nagar vs ITO (Int Taxn)-2, HyderabadITA 2340/HYD/2025[2016-17]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2016-17
- Kishor Kumar Aggarwal, Gurgaon vs ACIT-Central Circle-30- Delhi., DelhiITA 2305/DEL/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed7 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Kishor Kumar Aggarwal, Gurgaon vs ACIT-Central Circle-30, DelhiITA 2304/DEL/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed7 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Chenna Narayana Chakka, Hyderabad vs ITO, Ward 6(1), HyderabadITA 1944/HYD/2025[2014-15]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026AY 2014-15
- Chenna Narayana Chakka, Hyderabad vs ITO, Ward-6(1), HyderabadITA 1943/HYD/2025[2013-14]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026AY 2013-14
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- U Days Garments vs. The Adjudication OfficerMadras · 16 Oct 2026
- M/S Jsw Cement Limited,Jajpur vs. State Of OdishaOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- M/S.Sreeshobi Enterprises vs. The Appellate AuthorityMadras · 16 Oct 2026
- S.T.Promotors vs. The Commercial Tax OfficerMadras · 16 Oct 2026
- Prashanti Das (M/S. Panchamukhi Enterprises) vs. Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, CT And GST, Jagatsinghpur CircleOrissa · 16 Oct 2026