INCOME TAX OFFICER-1(2), RAIPUR, AAYAKAR BHAVAN vs. ABHINAV GREEN POWER INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED, TATIBANDH
What did the Tribunal hold?
The ITAT held that the CIT(Appeals) erred by not confronting the additional evidence filed by the assessee with the Assessing Officer for verification and response. The matter was remanded back to the CIT(Appeals) for fresh adjudication.
What were the facts?
The Assessing Officer made additions under Section 68 for share application money and unsecured loans. The CIT(Appeals) allowed the assessee's appeal based on additional evidence filed. The Revenue appealed this decision.
What were the issues?
Whether the CIT(Appeals) correctly allowed the appeal without providing the Assessing Officer an opportunity to examine additional evidence filed by the assessee. Whether Rule 46A(3) of the IT Rules, 1962 was complied with.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 68,Section 133(6),Section 143(2),Section 143(3),Section 250(4),Section 250(6)
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, RAIPUR BENCH “DB”, RAIPUR
Before: SHRI PARTHA SARATHI CHAUDHURY & SHRI AVDHESH KUMAR MISHRA
PER PARTHA SARATHI CHAUDHURY, JM: The present appeal preferred by the Revenue emanates from the order of the Ld.CIT(Appeals)/NFAC, Delhi dated 13.06.2025 for the assessment year 2013-14 as per the grounds of appeal on record.
The brief facts in this case are that the assessee company filed its return of income for A.Y. 2013-14 on 29-03-2014 declaring total income of Rs.7,65,830/-. During the year under consideration, the
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 68
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
- Bliss Dealtrade Private Limited, Kolkata vs Income Tax Officer - Ward 9(2) Kolkata…ITA 208/KOL/2026[2012-13]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-13
- Hemal Paresh Madeka, Rajkot vs Asst.Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 955/RJT/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Ajaybhai Dineshbhai Bagdai, Near Central… vs The Income Tax Officer, Ward-1(2)(1), New…ITA 74/RJT/2026[2013-14]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2013-14
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Jharkhand Contractors Association Thro Its President- Pramod Kumar vs. Bharat Coking Coal LTD. Thro Its Chairman Cum Managing DirectorJharkhand · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Isc Processors Private Limited vs. Superintendent,Range-Iv, Burrabazar Div, CGST And Cx, Kolkata (N) Commissionerate And AnrCalcutta · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Raashi Constructions vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of Commercial TaxesKarnataka · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Bidasaria Fenster Solutions vs. The State Of BiharPatna · 13 Oct 2026
- Amit Agency vs. Commissioner, CGST And CxPatna · 13 Oct 2026