M/S. GANESH TRADING COMPANY,VAPI vs. ACIT, VAPI CIRCLE, VAPI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the notice issued under Section 148 was time-barred as it was issued beyond the 'surviving time' permitted by Supreme Court decisions. Consequently, the assessment order was quashed.
What were the facts?
The assessee's assessment was reopened under Section 147 based on information received. A fresh notice under Section 148 was issued on 27.07.2022, which the assessee argued was time-barred. The CIT(A) upheld the AO's order.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was the validity of the notice issued under Section 148 for reassessment, specifically whether it was issued within the permissible time limits after considering Supreme Court rulings on reassessment procedures.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, SURAT BENCH, SURAT
Per B.M. Biyani, AM:
Feeling aggrieved by order of first appeal dated 13.03.2026 passed by learned Commissioner of Income-Tax (Appeals)-National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi [“CIT(A)”], which in turn arises out of assessment-order dated 22.05.2023 passed by learned Assessment Unit of Income-tax Department [“AO”] u/s 147 r.w.s. 144B of Income-tax Act, 1961 [“the Act”] for Assessment- Year [“AY”] 2017-18, the assessee has filed this appeal. M/s. Ganesh Trading Company
The background facts leading to present appeal are as under:
(i) The assessee is a partnership firm.
(ii) The Ld. AO, on the basis of infor
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 147
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Tarunaben Maganlal Bhut, Navagam vs ITO Ward 2(2)(1), RajkotITA 673/RJT/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Hindustan Coca-Cola Beverages PVT. LTD. vs. The Commissioner, CGST And Cx, Dibrugarh And AnrGauhati · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Shree Sushruta Health Services Private Limited vs. The Union Of INDIAPatna · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Rst Batteries vs. Deputy Commissioner CGST Delhi West & Ors.Delhi · 14 Oct 2026
- Dr.Sunil Kumar Padhi vs. The Chief Commissioner, GST And Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- N.K Fashion Through It Proprietor Mr. Narender Agarwal vs. Assistant Commissioner Of Central Goods And Service Tax, Delhi EastDelhi · 14 Oct 2026