PRAKASH GHANSHYAM BHUNGALIYA,SURAT vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 2(1)(3), SURAT, SURAT
What were the facts?
The assessee's case was reopened due to information about a cash purchase of immovable property. The assessee failed to comply with notices, leading to an ex-parte assessment with an addition for unexplained investment and penalties for non-compliance and concealment. The CIT(A) dismissed the appeals as belated without a hearing.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the CIT(A) violated the principles of natural justice and Section 250(1) by dismissing the appeals as belated without providing an opportunity for a hearing. The matters were restored to the CIT(A) for fresh adjudication.
What were the issues?
Whether the CIT(A) erred in dismissing the appeals as belated without affording a proper hearing to the assessee, thereby violating principles of natural justice and statutory provisions.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 147,Section 144,Section 144B,Section 69,Section 271(1)(b),Section 271(1)(c),Section 250(1)
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, SURAT BENCH, SURAT
Before: MS. SUCHITRA KAMBLE & SHRI B.M. BIYANI
Per B.M. Biyani, AM:
The captioned three (3) appeals are filed by assessee, the details of these appeals are as under:
(i) ITA 616/SRT/2026 is a Quantum-Appeal directed against the order of first appeal dated 19.01.2026 passed by learned Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals)-National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi [“CIT(A)”], which in turn arises out of the assessment-order dated
ITA No.616/SRT/2026 & Ors. Prakash Ghanshyam Bhungaliya
2022 passed by National Faceless Assessment Centre [“AO”] u/s 147 r.w.s. 144 & 144B of the Income-tax
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 147
- Nohar Yadav, Mandir Hasoud, Teh. Arang vs Income Tax Officer - Ward 1(2), Raipur…ITA 640/RPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Nohar Yadav, Mandir Hasoud, Teh. Arang vs Income Tax Officer - Ward 1(2), Raipur…ITA 639/RPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Nohar Yadav, Mandir Hasoud, Teh. Arang vs Income Tax Officer - Ward 1(2), Raipur…ITA 638/RPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Kishorbhai C Bhagtani, Rajkot vs Income Tax Officer Ward 2(1)(1), RajkotITA 999/RJT/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Malhar Nitin Bhuptani, Rajkotq vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 1054/RJT/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Bisleri International PVT.LTD, Mumbai vs. Principal Commissioner, Central Revenue Building, BhubaneswarOrissa · 7 Oct 2026
- M/S Saraswat Infra And Projects, Sundergarh vs. State Of OdishaOrissa · 7 Oct 2026
- Kamalakanta Nayak vs. The State Tax Officer, Mayurbhanj Circle,BalasoreOrissa · 7 Oct 2026
- M/S Vedvyas Logistics Private Limited, Sundargarh vs. State Of OdishaOrissa · 7 Oct 2026
- M/S Harilal Agarwalla vs. State Tax Officer, Kendrapara CircleOrissa · 7 Oct 2026