DY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, SURAT vs. J B ECOTEX LLP, SURAT
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the notice issued under Section 148 on 30.07.2022 was beyond the 'surviving time' as per the Supreme Court's decision in Rajeev Bansal, making it invalid. Consequently, the assessment order was quashed.
What were the facts?
The assessee's case for AY 2016-17 was reopened under Section 147. After a series of notices and following Supreme Court directions in Ashish Agarwal and Rajeev Bansal, a fresh notice under Section 148 was issued on 30.07.2022. The assessee contended this notice was time-barred.
What were the issues?
Whether the notice issued under Section 148 for reopening the assessment was time-barred considering the directions of the Supreme Court regarding 'surviving time' for reassessment proceedings.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, SURAT BENCH, SURAT
Per B.M. Biyani, AM:
Feeling aggrieved by order of first appeal dated 13.09.2025 passed by learned Commissioner of Income-Tax (Appeals)-National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi [“CIT(A)”], which in turn arises out of assessment-order dated 19.05.2023 passed by learned Assessment Unit of Income-tax Department [“AO”] u/s 147 r.w.s. 144B of Income-tax Act, 1961 [“the Act”] for Assessment- Year [“AY”] 2016-17, the assessee has filed this appeal. JB ECOTEX LLP
The background facts leading to present appeal are as under:
(i) The assessee-LLP filed its return of income of AY 2016-17 declaring a total in
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 147
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Tarunaben Maganlal Bhut, Navagam vs ITO Ward 2(2)(1), RajkotITA 673/RJT/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
Latest GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Ankil Jagdishchandra Kholwadwala vs. Union Of INDIA And AnrBombay · 22 Oct 2026
- Imtiyaz Shaikh Z Chorlekar vs. Salman ShaikhBombay · 21 Oct 2026
- S. Nithyananda vs. State Of KarnatakaKarnataka · 17 Oct 2026
- Venkadeswara Grill Works vs. The Joint Commissioner (St)Madras · 16 Oct 2026
- Mufti Clothing And Co vs. The Assistant Commissioner (St)Madras · 16 Oct 2026