NAVIN KUMAR KOCHAR,CUTTACK, ODISHA vs. ITO, WARD 1(1), CUTTACK, CUTTACK, ODISHA
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the amounts deposited in the bank account were disclosed in the assessee's cash book, which tallied with business transactions and was not disputed by the revenue. Since the cash book formed the basis for the returned income, the deposits could not be treated as unexplained income.
What were the facts?
The assessee deposited Rs. 75,29,900/- during the demonetization period. The Assessing Officer made an addition on the grounds that the assessee failed to provide details of debtors and confirmations. The assessee contended that the deposits were out of opening cash balance, cash sales, and collections from debtors, and that their books of account were not rejected.
What were the issues?
Whether cash deposits made during the demonetization period, which are explained by the assessee's cash book and business transactions, can be treated as unexplained income.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, CUTTACK BENCH CUTTACK
Before: SHRI GEORGE MATHAN & SHRI GOPALAN GURUSAMY
Per Bench: This is an appeal filed by the assessee against the order of the NFAC, DELHI [hereinafter referred to as the ‘CIT(A)’] in appeal no.NFAC/2016-17/10243223 dated 20.04.2026 for the assessment year 2017-18. 2. Shri K.K.Bajoria, AR appeared on behalf of the assessee and Shri Vijay Singh, Sr. D.R. represented on behalf of the revenue.
It was submitted by the ld. AR that the only issue in the assessee’s appeal is against the addition of Rs.75,29,900/- deposited during the demonetization period. It was the submission that th
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Hindustan Coca-Cola Beverages PVT. LTD. vs. The Commissioner, CGST And Cx, Dibrugarh And AnrGauhati · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Shree Sushruta Health Services Private Limited vs. The Union Of INDIAPatna · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Rst Batteries vs. Deputy Commissioner CGST Delhi West & Ors.Delhi · 14 Oct 2026
- Dr.Sunil Kumar Padhi vs. The Chief Commissioner, GST And Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- N.K Fashion Through It Proprietor Mr. Narender Agarwal vs. Assistant Commissioner Of Central Goods And Service Tax, Delhi EastDelhi · 14 Oct 2026