JIASH CREATIONS PVT. LTD.,MUMBAI vs. ITO, WARD 12(3)(1), MUMBAI
What were the facts?
The assessee, a domestic company, opted for concessional tax under section 115BAA by filing its return and Form 10-IC. However, the CPC processed the return at the normal tax rate of 30% due to a delay in furnishing Form 10-IC.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the delay in furnishing Form 10-IC was condoned by CBDT Circular No. 19/2023, as all conditions stipulated therein were fulfilled. Therefore, the assessee was entitled to the concessional tax rate under section 115BAA.
What were the issues?
Whether the delay in furnishing Form 10-IC for opting under section 115BAA can be condoned by CBDT Circular, and if so, whether the assessee is entitled to the concessional tax rate.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Before: SHRI AMIT SHUKLA & SHRI ARUN KHODPIA
PER AMIT SHUKLA (J.M):
The aforesaid appeal has been filed by the assessee against the order dated 13.04.2026 passed by the learned Additional/Joint Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals), Thiruvananthapuram, arising out of the order passed by the Centralised Processing Centre under section 154 of the Income- tax Act, 1961, for the Assessment Year 2021–22. The assessee has principally challenged the denial of the concessional rate of tax under section 115BAA and the consequential computation of P a g e | 2 A.Y. 2021-22 Jiash Creations Pvt. Ltd. its tax liabi
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 115BAA
- Ceat Limited, Mumbai vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income-Tax…ITA 8146/MUM/2025[2020-21]Status: Disposed29 Sept 2026AY 2020-21
- Triveni Interchem Private Limited, Vapi vs DCIT, Valsad Circle, ValsadITA 1199/SRT/2025[2022-23]Status: Disposed25 Sept 2026AY 2022-23
- Tirthnkar Financial Services Private… vs ITO Ward 4(3)(1), MumbaiITA 2982/MUM/2026[2021-22]Status: Disposed22 Sept 2026AY 2021-22
- Falcon Bus Lines Private Limited, Mumbai vs DCIT 5(1)(1), MumbaiITA 7271/MUM/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed18 Sept 2026AY 2024-25
- Prime Source World Wide Private Limited… vs ITO, Ward - 16(1), HyderabadITA 1016/HYD/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed18 Sept 2026AY 2024-25
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Smita Chawda vs. Aadharshila Developers PVT LTD.Chhattisgarh · 6 Oct 2026
- Sahil vs. M/S Aadharshila Developers PVT LTD.Chhattisgarh · 6 Oct 2026
- Mayank Arc And Electrodes Private Limited & Anr. vs. Assistant Commissioner CGST Laxmi Nagar Division & Ors.Delhi · 6 Oct 2026
- Jogender Proprietor Of M/S J.K. Construction vs. The Joint Commissioner (Appeals-Ii) & Anr.Delhi · 6 Oct 2026
- Tvl. Sri Murugan Tyres vs. The Deputy State Tax Officer-1/ The Deputy Commercial Tax OfficerMadras · 6 Oct 2026