ITO, MUMBAI vs. DEEPA MANOJ PARDASANY, MUMBAI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the CIT(A) erred in deleting the additions without appreciating the surrounding circumstances and material evidencing the sham nature of the transaction. The Tribunal also found that the CIT(A) erred in holding that the assessee discharged the onus of proving identity, creditworthiness, and genuineness based solely on routine documentary evidence.
What were the facts?
The Revenue appealed against the CIT(A)'s order deleting additions made under Section 69A and 69C. The additions were based on allegations that a loan from M/s Aneri Fincap Limited (AFL) was an accommodation entry, despite the assessee providing documentary evidence and repayment details.
What were the issues?
Whether reassessment proceedings were validly initiated and whether the loan transaction with AFL was genuine despite evidence suggesting it was an accommodation entry.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 69A,Section 115BBE,Section 69C,Section 147,Section 143(3),Section 153C,Section 132(4),Section 68
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Before: SHRI PAWAN SINGH & SHRI PRABHASH SHANKAR
आदेश की प्रतितलति अग्रेतिि/Copy of the Order forwarded to : 1. अपीलार्थी / The Appellant 2. प्रत्यर्थी / The Respondent.
P a g e | 15 ITA No. 2387/Mum/2026 A.Y. 2019-20 Deepa Manoj Pardasany 3. आयकर आयुक्त / CIT 4. विभागीय प्रविविवि, आयकर अपीलीय अविकरण DR, ITAT, Mumbai 5. गार्ड फाईल / Guard file. सत्यावपि प्रवि //True Copy// आदेशानुसार/ BY ORDER,
उि/सहायक िंजीकार (Dy./Asstt. Registrar) आयकर अिीलीय अतिकरण/ ITAT, Bench, Mumbai.1
More judgments on Section 69A
- Vishal Kumar Patel(HUF), Raipur vs DCIT, Circle-1(1), RaipurITA 595/RPR/2026[2017-18]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- Adj Agri International LLP, Rajkot vs The Income Tax Officer, Ward-1(1)(1), RajkotITA 1198/RJT/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Ashok Singh, Jaipur vs ACIT, Circle-2 Jaipur, JaipurITA 1540/JPR/2025[2015-16]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- Hemal Paresh Madeka, Rajkot vs Asst.Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 955/RJT/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Neepaben Sunnybhai Motwani, Rajkot vs Income Tax Officer, RajkotITA 875/RJT/2026[2021-22]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- S. Nithyananda vs. State Of KarnatakaKarnataka · 17 Oct 2026
- Acc LTD. vs. Secy.Industries Deptt.Orissa · 16 Oct 2026
- Kumaran Transports (Tuticorin) Private Limited vs. The Assistant Commissioner Madras · 16 Oct 2026
- Tvl. Sri Sr Rice Mill Deppo vs. The Deputy State Tax Officer - 1Madras · 16 Oct 2026
- M/S Saswat Traders, Jagatsinghpur vs. The Chief Commissioner Of Commercial Taxes And Goods And Services Tax, Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 16 Oct 2026