DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL-2, RAIPUR, NAWA RAIPUR vs. SATISH SHARMA, RAIPUR
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal set aside the order of the CIT(Appeals) and remanded the matter back to the CIT(Appeals) with a direction to adjudicate the legal grounds raised by the assessee. The Revenue's appeal was allowed for statistical purposes.
What were the facts?
The Revenue appealed an order of the CIT(Appeals) concerning assessment year 2014-15. The assessee raised several legal grounds challenging the reassessment proceedings, which were not adjudicated by the CIT(Appeals).
What were the issues?
Whether the reassessment proceedings were validly initiated and conducted, considering issues of jurisdiction, proper notice, and sanction for reassessment. Whether the CIT(Appeals) erred by not adjudicating the legal grounds raised by the assessee.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 144,Section 147,Section 148,Section 120,Section 127,Section 143(2),Section 151(2)
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, RAIPUR BENCH, “DB” RAIPUR
Before: SHRI R.K PANDA & SHRI PARTHA SARATHI CHAUDHURY
PER PARTHA SARATHI CHAUDHURY, JM:
The present appeal preferred by the Revenue emanates from the order of the Ld.CIT(Appeals), Raipur-3 dated 27.03.2026 for the assessment year 2014-15 as per the grounds of appeal on record.
In this case, the Ld. Counsel for the assessee has filed an application under Rule 27 of the ITAT Rules, 1963 assailing various legal grounds which reads as follows: “Additional Ground No.2 On the facts and in the circumstances of th
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 147
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Tarunaben Maganlal Bhut, Navagam vs ITO Ward 2(2)(1), RajkotITA 673/RJT/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Md. Akhtar Ansari, Proprietor Of M/S Indian Associates vs. State Of Jharkhand, Through Commissioner Of State Tax, Commercial Tax Dept.Jharkhand · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S. Amarjothi Granites (INDIA) PVT. LTD., Berhampur, Ganjam vs. The Commissioner, Commercial Tax And GST, Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S. Mishka Steels LLP And Anr. vs. The Superintendent Of Central Goods And Service Tax, Cx, Range-Ii, Behala Div. And Ors.Calcutta · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Gujarat Co-Operative Milk Marketing Federation Limited vs. Union Of INDIAGujarat · 14 Oct 2026
- Ramesh K Devadiga vs. Khernagar Nandadeep Co Operative Housing Society LTDBombay · 14 Oct 2026