JALARAM PULSES PRIVATE LIMITED,GUJARAT vs. DCIT/ACIT CIRCLE 1(1), RAJKOT
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal allowed the appeal for statistical purposes, remanding the matter to the CIT(A) for de novo adjudication. The assessee is directed to submit all relevant documents and comply with notices.
What were the facts?
The assessee's appeal against the CIT(A)'s ex-parte order was heard. The CIT(A) had upheld the AO's addition of Rs. 1,51,55,000/- as unexplained cash credit. The assessee failed to provide required details to the CIT(A) despite multiple opportunities.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was the addition of unexplained cash credit under Section 68. The assessee also contested the applicability of Section 56, interest charges, and penalty proceedings.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 68,Section 56,Section 234B,Section 234C,Section 234D,Section 271(1)(c),Section 274,Section 250
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “RAJKOT BENCH” , RAJKOT
Before: DR. B.R.R. KUMAR & SHRI SONJOY SARMA
PER: DR. B.R.R. KUMAR, VICE PRESIDENT:
This appeal has been filed by the assessee against the order of the Ld. Commissioner of Income-Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi (hereinafter referred to as "CIT(A)" for short) dated 24.02.2025, passed u/s 250 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, (hereinafter referred to as "the Act" for short) for the Assessment Year (AY) 2014-15. Jalaram Pulses Pvt. Ltd. Vs. DCIT/ACIT Asst.Years : 2014-15 - 2–
The assessee has raised the following grounds of appeal:
The order of the Assessing Officer (herein after referred to as AO) in so far as he assessed the total income at Rs. 1,57,41,530/- against returned income of Rs. 5,86,530
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 68
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
- Bliss Dealtrade Private Limited, Kolkata vs Income Tax Officer - Ward 9(2) Kolkata…ITA 208/KOL/2026[2012-13]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-13
- Hemal Paresh Madeka, Rajkot vs Asst.Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 955/RJT/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Ajaybhai Dineshbhai Bagdai, Near Central… vs The Income Tax Officer, Ward-1(2)(1), New…ITA 74/RJT/2026[2013-14]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2013-14
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Sanjay Maheshwari vs. Union Of INDIA & Ors.Delhi · 14 Oct 2026
- Iyyanan Eswaran vs. The Appellate Deputy Commissioner (St) (GST)Madras · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Dc Security Services vs. Commissioner Of Central Goods And Services TaxUttarakhand · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Shreekanth Enterprises vs. Joint Commissioner AppealsUttarakhand · 14 Oct 2026
- Sharad Ashok Agarwal vs. State Of Maharashtra Through G.P. And OrsBombay · 14 Oct 2026