KUSHAL SURI SEVA TRUST,AKOLA vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTIONS),PUNE, PUNE
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal set aside the CIT's order and restored the matter to the CIT's file. The CIT was directed to re-decide the application after considering the copy of the regular registration certificate already provided by the assessee.
What were the facts?
The assessee trust applied for registration under Section 12A(1)(ac)(ii) of the IT Act. The CIT rejected the application, stating that the assessee had provided a provisional registration certificate instead of a regular one.
What were the issues?
Whether the rejection of the registration application was justified when the assessee had submitted a regular registration certificate that the CIT allegedly failed to consider.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, PUNE BENCH “A”, PUNE
Before: SHRI MANISH BORAD & SHRI VINAY BHAMORE
PER VINAY BHAMORE, JM: This appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order dated 10.03.2026 passed by Ld. CIT, Exemption, Pune rejecting the application for registration u/s 12A of the IT Act.
Facts of the case, in brief, are that the assessee has filed application for registration in Form No.10AB under sub-clause (ii) of clause (ac) of sub-section (1) of section 12A of the IT Act on 2 30.09.2025. On verification of the information furnished by the assessee, Ld. CIT, Exemption, Pune found that the assessee has not furnished the copy of regular registration, either u/s 12A(1)(ac)(i) or u/s 12A(1)(ac)(iii) of the IT Act, however, furnished copy of provisional re
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 12A
- Desire Foundation, Jaipur vs Income Tax Officer, JaipurITA 1646/JPR/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Sanskardham Nandan, Mehsana vs CIT(Exemption), AhmedabadITA 2980/AHD/2026[2025-26]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2025-26
- Global University Foundation, Hyderabad vs CIT(Exemption), HyderabadITA 777/HYD/2026[2026-27]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2026-27
- Global University Foundation, Hyderabad vs CIT(Exemption), HyderabadITA 776/HYD/2026[2026-27]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2026-27
- Shiva Shiksha Samiti, Deendayal Puram, Up… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward-Exemption, Agra…ITA 415/AGR/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Jharkhand Contractors Association Thro Its President- Pramod Kumar vs. Bharat Coking Coal LTD. Thro Its Chairman Cum Managing DirectorJharkhand · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Isc Processors Private Limited vs. Superintendent,Range-Iv, Burrabazar Div, CGST And Cx, Kolkata (N) Commissionerate And AnrCalcutta · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Raashi Constructions vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of Commercial TaxesKarnataka · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Bidasaria Fenster Solutions vs. The State Of BiharPatna · 13 Oct 2026
- Amit Agency vs. Commissioner, CGST And CxPatna · 13 Oct 2026