SHREE JAGADGURU MOUNESHWAR PATTIN SAHAKARI SANGH NIYAMIT KERUR,BAGALKOT vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD(1), BAGALKOT

ITA 2884/BANG/2025Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore21 September 2026AY 2016-179 pages
AI SummaryAllowed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal condoned the delay, finding sufficient cause. It held that interest earned by a co-operative society engaged in credit facilities from deposits of surplus funds in co-operative banks is eligible for deduction under Section 80P(2)(a)(i). The decision relied upon by the CIT(A) was distinguished as it pertained to Section 80P(2)(d).

What were the facts?

The assessee, a co-operative credit society, claimed deduction under Section 80P(2)(a)(i) for interest earned on deposits with co-operative banks and statutory reserve funds. The Assessing Officer and CIT(A) disallowed this deduction, treating the interest as 'Income from Other Sources'. The appeal was filed with a delay of 128 days.

What were the issues?

Whether interest income earned by a co-operative credit society from deposits with other co-operative banks is eligible for deduction under Section 80P(2)(a)(i) of the Income Tax Act. Whether the delay in filing the appeal should be condoned.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 80P(2)(a)(i),Section 80P(2)(d),Section 148A,Section 147,Section 144B,Section 250

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, BANGALORE BENCHES, BANGALORE

Before: SHRI PRASHANT MAHARISHI & SHRI SANDEEP SINGH KARHAIL

PER SANDEEP SINGH KARHAIL, JUDICIAL MEMBER:

The assessee has filed the present appeal against the impugned order dated 27/05/2025, passed under section 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (“the Act”) by the learned Commissione

The order continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

More judgments on Section 80P(2)(a)(i)

All 2,347 judgments and leading authorities on Section 80P(2)(a)(i) →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →