MAHESHMATI NAGRIK SAHKARI BANK LTD,MANDLA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, MANDLA WARD, MANDLA, MANDLA
What were the facts?
A co-operative bank faced disallowance of interest expenses amounting to ₹1,04,96,367/- under Section 40(a)(ia) for allegedly not submitting a complete list of depositors and Form 15H/15G. The assessee contended that these documents were duly submitted to the tax authorities.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The tribunal held that once Form 15G/15H are received by the deductor, the liability to deduct tax at source under Section 194A ceases as per Section 197A. Therefore, Section 40(a)(ia) cannot be invoked merely for non-filing these forms with the designated authority, and the disallowance was set aside.
What were the issues?
Whether disallowance under Section 40(a)(ia) is applicable when Form 15G/15H are obtained from depositors, thereby negating TDS liability under Section 194A read with Section 197A, even if these forms were not filed with the designated authority.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 40(a)(ia),Section 194A,Section 197A,Section 272A(2)(f)
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, JABALPUR BENCH, MP
Before: HON’BLE SHRI KUL BHARAT & SHRI G.D. PADMAHSHALI
PER G. D. PADMAHSHALI; The first appellate DIN & Order No. ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2024-
25/1071277596(1) dt. 17/12/2024 passed by National Faceless
Appeal Centre, Delhi [‘Ld. NFAC’] u/s 250 of the Income Tax
Act, 1961 [‘the Act’] by present appeal is challenged by the assessee u/s 253(1) of the Act which dealt with assessment order
passed u/s 143(3) of the Act by the Income Tax Officer, Madla
[‘Ld. AO’] for assessment year 2015-16 [‘AY’].
ITAT-Jabalpur Maheshmati Nagrik Sahkari Bank Ltd. Vs ITO ITA No. 044/JAB/2025 AY: 2015-16
The facts of the case succinctly stated are that;
1 the assessee is Co-operative Bank engaged in fin
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 40(a)(ia)
- R S Industech Private Limited, Gandhidham vs ITO Ward-2, GandhidhamITA 843/RJT/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- C.B. Constructions, Satara vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, SataraITA 1371/PUN/2026[2013-14]Status: Disposed6 Oct 2026AY 2013-14
- Santosh Kumar Bhogi, Visakhapatnam vs Deputy Commissioner of Income-Tax…ITA 253/VIZ/2026[2023-24]Status: Disposed1 Oct 2026AY 2023-24
- Santosh Kumar Bhogi, Visakhapatnam vs Deputy Commissioner of Income-Tax…ITA 253/VIZ/2026[2023-24]Status: Disposed1 Oct 2026AY 2023-24
- Champion Omdev Construction Limited, Patna vs Asst Commissioner of Income-Tax Circle 1…ITA 72/PAT/2026[2023-2024]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026AY 2023-2024
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Biswa Nath Mondal vs. State Of West Bengal And Ors.Calcutta · 8 Oct 2026
- M/S Vibrations And Ors. vs. Assistant Commissioner Of Revenue, State Tax, Chandni Chawk And Princep Street Charge And Ors.Calcutta · 8 Oct 2026
- Sheela Foam Limited And Anr vs. The Deputy Commissioner State Tax Shibpur Charge And OrsCalcutta · 8 Oct 2026
- Mihir Kumar Biswas vs. Asst. Commissioner Of Revenue, State Tax, Krishnanagar Charge And Ors.Calcutta · 8 Oct 2026
- Vasu Chauhan vs. State Of UttarakhandUttarakhand · 8 Oct 2026