RAJASTHAN STATE GANGANAGAR SUGAR MILLS LIMITED,JAIPUR vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, JAIPUR
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal found that the CIT(A) failed to adjudicate the appeal on merits and did not follow the requirements of Section 250(6) of the Act. Therefore, the matter was restored to the CIT(A) for fresh adjudication.
What were the facts?
The assessee claimed a deduction under Section 80G for CSR expenses, which the AO disallowed. The CIT(A) dismissed the appeal ex parte without adjudicating on merits, citing non-compliance by the assessee. The assessee appealed this ex parte order.
What were the issues?
Whether the CIT(A) erred in passing an ex parte order without adjudicating the grounds on merits. Whether CSR expenditure donations are eligible for deduction under Section 80G.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 80G,Section 250(6),Section 37,Section 135,Section 36(1)(va)
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘B’ BENCH, JAIPUR
Before: Shri Kuldip Singh & Shri Prakash
PER : PRAKASH, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER:-
This appeal by the Assessee is directed against the order of the learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi [hereinafter referred to as “the learned CIT(A)”] dated 09.06.2025 arising out of the assessment order dated 16.09.2022 passed by the Assessing Officer (hereinafter referred to as “the AO”) under section 143(3) read with section 144B of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as “the Act”) for the assessment year 2020-21. Rajasthan State Ganganagar Sugar Mills Limited
There is a delay of 159 days in filing this
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 80G
- Savan Dayalal Ladani, Rajkot vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax-2(1)…ITA 575/RJT/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Pareshbhai Savjibhai Khunt, Rajkot vs Income Tax Officer Ward - 2(2)(3), RajkotITA 842/RJT/2025[2019-20]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Gillette India Limited, Mumbai vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, JaipurITA 1316/JPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Global University Foundation, Hyderabad vs CIT(Exemption), HyderabadITA 777/HYD/2026[2026-27]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2026-27
- Global University Foundation, Hyderabad vs CIT(Exemption), HyderabadITA 776/HYD/2026[2026-27]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2026-27
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Chandan Kumar Bathual vs. Superintendent, CGST And Central Excise, Cuttack-Iii Range, CuttackOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Manoranjan Sadangi vs. Superintendent, CGST And Central Excise, Gopalpur Range, GanjamOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Bijaya Kumar Parekh vs. State Tax Officer, CT And GST Balangir Circle, BalangirOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Puspanjali Bhuyan vs. The Commissioner Of CT And GST, OdishaOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S A2Z Infra Engineering LTD vs. Union Of INDIA And Ors.Calcutta · 14 Oct 2026