VIJAYVARGIA (VAISHYA) RAJSEVAK PARISHAD (SANSHTHAN),JAIPUR vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTION) JAIPUR, JAIPUR
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the appellant was not provided with a reasonable opportunity of being heard as there was no evidence of proper service of notices. Therefore, the impugned orders were set aside and the matter was remanded for fresh adjudication.
What were the facts?
The appellant society applied for registration under Section 12AB and approval under Section 80G of the Income Tax Act. The CIT(E) rejected these applications citing incomplete forms and lack of registration under the Rajasthan Public Trust Act, 1959.
What were the issues?
Whether the rejection of applications for registration and approval was valid without providing the assessee with an adequate opportunity of being heard.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, JAIPUR “B” BENCH, JAIPUR
Before: SHRI KULDIP SINGH & SHRI PRAKASH, ACCOUNTANCT MEMBER
PER : KULDIP SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMBER:-
The Appellant, Vijayvargia (Vaishya) Rajsevak Parishad (Sanshthan) by filing aforesaid interconnected appeals, sought to set aside the impugned orders both dated 19.03.2026 passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption), Jaipur [hereinafter referred to as the ‘CIT(E)’] on the grounds inter-alia that:- I.T.A No. 1692 & 1693/JPR/2026 Page No 2 Vijayvargia (Vaishya) Rajsevak Parishad (Sanshthan)
“Ground 1. That in the law and in the facts and circumstances of the case the ld. Assessing Officer grossly erred in rejecting the application filed by the assessee society u/s 12AB of the Act vide order dated 19.03.2026
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 12AB
- Desire Foundation, Jaipur vs Income Tax Officer, JaipurITA 1646/JPR/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Sheo Narayan Trust, Khajpura vs CIT Exemption, PatnaITA 554/PAT/2026[2025-2026]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2025-2026
- Ss Early Learning Society, Hyderabad vs CIT (Exemption), HyderabadITA 1208/HYD/2025[2026-27]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2026-27
- Shri Brajshiromani Laxmandas Sewa Trust… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward 1(3)(1), Mathura…ITA 592/AGR/2026[2026-2027]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2026-2027
- Shri Brajshiromani Laxmandas Sewa Trust… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward 1(3)(1), Mathura…ITA 591/AGR/2026[2026-2027]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2026-2027
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Ramesh K Devadiga And Ors vs. Khernagar Nandadeep Co-Operative Housing Society LTD And OrsBombay · 14 Oct 2026
- Permender Singh vs. Union Of INDIA And Ors.Calcutta · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Abdhish Dhal Samanta, Bhubaneswar vs. Chief Commissioner, CT And GST, Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Kniit Net Industries Private Limited, Khurda vs. Superintendent Of CGST And Central Excise, Bhubaneswar Ii CircleOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Maa Swarnapai Chemicals (Opc) Private Limited, Cuttack vs. Sales Tax Officer, Cuttack IOrissa · 14 Oct 2026