RADHA GOVIND DHAM,AJMER vs. CIT EXEMPTION JAIPUR, JAIPUR
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal dismissed the appeals, finding that the assessee failed to provide necessary documentation to establish the genuineness of its activities and that the religious nature of its objects was not adequately addressed. The Tribunal also noted that the rejection of the 12AB registration was independently sustainable, rendering the 80G issue moot.
What were the facts?
The assessee trust applied for registration under Section 12AB and approval under Section 80G. The CIT(E) rejected both applications, citing lack of registration under the Rajasthan Public Trust Act, failure to establish genuineness of activities, and the trust's religious nature.
What were the issues?
Whether the assessee's activities were genuine and whether its religious objects disqualified it from 80G approval.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘B’ BENCH, JAIPUR
Before: Shri Kuldip Singh & Shri Prakash
PER : PRAKASH, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER:-
These two appeals by the Assessee are directed against two separate orders of the learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption), Jaipur [hereinafter referred to as “the learned CIT(E)”], both dated 26.11.2025, passed under the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as “the Act”). As the appeals pertain to the same assessee and arise from connected orders, they are disposed of by this common order. The particulars are as under:
ITA No. Order Subject matter impugned 108/JPR/2026 Order dated Rejection of the application in Form 26.11.2025 in No. 10AB filed under section Form No. 10AD 12A(1)(ac)(ii) of the Act for registration under section 12AB of the Act 105/JPR/2026 Order dated R
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 12AB
- Desire Foundation, Jaipur vs Income Tax Officer, JaipurITA 1646/JPR/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Sheo Narayan Trust, Khajpura vs CIT Exemption, PatnaITA 554/PAT/2026[2025-2026]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2025-2026
- Ss Early Learning Society, Hyderabad vs CIT (Exemption), HyderabadITA 1208/HYD/2025[2026-27]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2026-27
- Shri Brajshiromani Laxmandas Sewa Trust… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward 1(3)(1), Mathura…ITA 592/AGR/2026[2026-2027]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2026-2027
- Shri Brajshiromani Laxmandas Sewa Trust… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward 1(3)(1), Mathura…ITA 591/AGR/2026[2026-2027]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2026-2027
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Md. Akhtar Ansari, Proprietor Of M/S Indian Associates vs. State Of Jharkhand, Through Commissioner Of State Tax, Commercial Tax Dept.Jharkhand · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S. Amarjothi Granites (INDIA) PVT. LTD., Berhampur, Ganjam vs. The Commissioner, Commercial Tax And GST, Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S. Mishka Steels LLP And Anr. vs. The Superintendent Of Central Goods And Service Tax, Cx, Range-Ii, Behala Div. And Ors.Calcutta · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Gujarat Co-Operative Milk Marketing Federation Limited vs. Union Of INDIAGujarat · 14 Oct 2026
- Ramesh K Devadiga vs. Khernagar Nandadeep Co Operative Housing Society LTDBombay · 14 Oct 2026