OM PRAKASH,JAIPUR vs. ITO WARD 3(1), JAIPUR, JAIPUR
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal set aside the orders of the lower authorities and restored the matter to the AO. The AO is directed to examine the assessee's claim that the liquor shop's income was already assessed in the hands of an association of persons.
What were the facts?
The assessee did not file a return for AY 2008-09. The AO made an ex-parte assessment by estimating income at 8% of liquor trading receipts. The CIT(A) dismissed the assessee's appeal for non-compliance with notices and lack of evidence.
What were the issues?
Whether the ex-parte assessment and confirmation by CIT(A) were valid, and whether the income from the liquor shop was already assessed in the hands of an association of persons.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 144,Section 147,Section 148,Section 142(1),Section 250,Section 143(3),Section 46A,Section 234A,Section 234B,Section 234C
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘B’ BENCH, JAIPUR
Before: Shri Kuldip Singh & Shri Prakash
PER : PRAKASH, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER:-
This appeal by the Assessee is directed against the order of the learned Additional/Joint Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-1, Gurugram [hereinafter referred to as “the learned JCIT(A)”] dated 08.09.2025 arising out of the assessment order dated 25.01.2016 passed by the Income Tax Officer, Ward 3(1), Jaipur (hereinafter referred to as “the AO”) under section 144 read with section 147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as “the Act”) for the assessment year 2008-09. Om Prakash
The grounds of appeal raised by the Assessee before us in the memorandum of appeal in Form No. 36 read as under:
“1. The impugned order u/s 147 rw
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 147
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Tarunaben Maganlal Bhut, Navagam vs ITO Ward 2(2)(1), RajkotITA 673/RJT/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Hindustan Coca-Cola Beverages PVT. LTD. vs. The Commissioner, CGST And Cx, Dibrugarh And AnrGauhati · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Shree Sushruta Health Services Private Limited vs. The Union Of INDIAPatna · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Rst Batteries vs. Deputy Commissioner CGST Delhi West & Ors.Delhi · 14 Oct 2026
- Dr.Sunil Kumar Padhi vs. The Chief Commissioner, GST And Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- N.K Fashion Through It Proprietor Mr. Narender Agarwal vs. Assistant Commissioner Of Central Goods And Service Tax, Delhi EastDelhi · 14 Oct 2026