N.G.GADHIYA FOUNDATION TRUST,JAIPUR vs. CIT(EXEMPTION), JAIPUR, JAIPUR
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal condoned the delay in filing the application, finding that the CIT(E) erred in treating the trust as purely religious and in concluding that religious expenditure exceeded the permissible limit. The Tribunal set aside the CIT(E)'s order and restored the application for fresh consideration.
What were the facts?
The assessee, N.G. Gadhiya Foundation Trust, had its application for regular approval under Section 80G rejected by the CIT(E), who also cancelled its provisional approval. The CIT(E) cited the trust's religious nature, excessive religious expenditure, and delay in filing the application as reasons.
What were the issues?
Whether the trust is primarily religious, whether religious expenditure exceeded the permissible limit, and whether the delay in filing the application for regular approval under Section 80G should be condoned.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘B’ BENCH, JAIPUR
Before: Shri Kuldip Singh & Shri Prakash
PER : PRAKASH, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER:-
This appeal by the Assessee is directed against the order of the learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption), Jaipur [hereinafter referred to as "the learned CIT(E)"] dated 27.03.2025 passed in Form No. 10AD, whereby the application of the Assessee in Form No. 10AB for approval under clause (iii) of the first proviso to sub-section (5) of section 80G of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as "the Act") was rejected and the provisional approval granted to the Assessee on 09.02.2024 under clause (iv) of the first proviso to sub-section (5) of section 80G of the Act was cancelled.
There is a delay of 130 days in filing this appeal before us. Th
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 80G
- Savan Dayalal Ladani, Rajkot vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax-2(1)…ITA 575/RJT/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Pareshbhai Savjibhai Khunt, Rajkot vs Income Tax Officer Ward - 2(2)(3), RajkotITA 842/RJT/2025[2019-20]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Gillette India Limited, Mumbai vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, JaipurITA 1316/JPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Global University Foundation, Hyderabad vs CIT(Exemption), HyderabadITA 777/HYD/2026[2026-27]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2026-27
- Global University Foundation, Hyderabad vs CIT(Exemption), HyderabadITA 776/HYD/2026[2026-27]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2026-27
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Dillip Kumar Behera vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, Mayurbhanj CircleOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S. Kalinga Paper Mart, Sundergarh vs. Commissioner Of CT And GST, CuttackOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Kabita Nayak vs. Chief Commissioner, CGST, Central Excise And Customs, KhurdaOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Swastika Ingot PVT.LTD, Sundargarh vs. The Addl Commissioner, GST And Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S Basudev Logistics, Jagatsinghpur vs. Principal Commissioner, CGST And Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 15 Oct 2026