SCOTT EDIL ADVANCE RESEARCH LABORATORIES AND EDUCATION LIMITED,CHANDIGARH vs. DCIT/ACIT(CEN)-1 CHD, CHANDIGARH
What were the facts?
The assessee made significant purchases from its holding company, which were considered 'specified domestic transactions'. The assessee failed to furnish the prescribed report (Form No. 3CEB) for these transactions. Subsequently, penalty proceedings were initiated and an order was passed after the relevant provision of the Income Tax Act was omitted.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The tribunal held that since the foundational provision (Section 92BA(i)) that triggered the penalty was omitted from the statute before the penalty order was passed, the penalty could not be sustained. The omission of a provision is considered as if it never existed, unless there is a saving clause.
What were the issues?
Whether penalty under Section 271BA can be levied for non-furnishing of Form 3CEB when the relevant provision (Section 92BA(i)) was omitted from the statute prior to the penalty order.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “B” BENCH, CHANDIGARH
Before: HON’BLE SHRI MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL, AM & HON’BLE SHRI RAJESH DAMODARLAL SHARMA, JM
Heard together (3 matters)
Read from the judgment's own cause title. This page is filed under one of them.
RAJESH DAMODARLAL SHARMA (Judicial Member)
Aforesaid three appeals by assessee have identical facts as well as issues i.e., confirmation of penalty u/s 271BA for Rs.1 Lacs each. First,
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 271BA
- Scott Edil Advance Research Laboratories… vs DCIT/ACIT(Cen)-1 Chd, ChandigarhITA 1541/CHANDI/2025[2015-16]Status: Disposed22 Sept 2026AY 2015-16
- Scott Edil Advance Research Laboratories… vs DCIT/ACIT(Cen)-1 Chd, ChandigarhITA 1540/CHANDI/2025[2014-15]Status: Disposed22 Sept 2026AY 2014-15
- ACIT CC 2(4) Mumbai, Mumbai vs Giraffe Developers Pvt Ltd, MumbaiITA 1969/MUM/2026[2014-15]Status: Disposed15 Jul 2026AY 2014-15
- P C Snehal Engineers Private Limited… vs DCIT, Circle 3(1)(1), AhmedabadITA 1174/AHD/2026[2014-15]Status: Disposed14 Jul 2026AY 2014-15
- P C Snehal Engineers Private Limited… vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 1173/AHD/2026[2014-15]Status: Disposed14 Jul 2026AY 2014-15
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Biswa Nath Mondal vs. State Of West Bengal And Ors.Calcutta · 8 Oct 2026
- M/S Vibrations And Ors. vs. Assistant Commissioner Of Revenue, State Tax, Chandni Chawk And Princep Street Charge And Ors.Calcutta · 8 Oct 2026
- Sheela Foam Limited And Anr vs. The Deputy Commissioner State Tax Shibpur Charge And OrsCalcutta · 8 Oct 2026
- Mihir Kumar Biswas vs. Asst. Commissioner Of Revenue, State Tax, Krishnanagar Charge And Ors.Calcutta · 8 Oct 2026
- Vasu Chauhan vs. State Of UttarakhandUttarakhand · 8 Oct 2026