THE CHARITABLE TRUST OF THE ROTARY CLUB OF KANKARIA,AHMEDABAD vs. THE ITO, WARD-2(EXEMPTION), AHMEDABAD
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the explanation provided by the assessee for the inordinate delay was not sufficient. Mere omission or oversight, even considering the pandemic, did not constitute a valid ground for condoning such a prolonged delay without demonstrating due diligence.
What were the facts?
The assessee, a charitable trust, filed an appeal before the CIT(A) with a significant delay of over 5 years. The assessee cited the COVID-19 pandemic and inadvertent oversight as reasons for the delay. The CIT(A) declined to condone the delay and dismissed the appeal.
What were the issues?
Whether the delay in filing the appeal before the CIT(A) was sufficiently explained and ought to be condoned.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “A” BENCH, AHMEDABAD
Before: DR. B.R.R. KUMAR, VICE- & SHRI RAHUL CHAUDHARY
PER DR. B.R.R. KUMAR, VICE-PRESIDENT:
-
This appeal has been filed by the Assessee against the order dated 20.09.2025 passed by the Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), National faceless Appeal Centre (hereinafter referred to as ‘Ld. CIT (A)’ in short), under Section 250 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’ in short) for Assessment Year 2018-2019. ITA No.2093/AHD/2025, AY-2018-19 The Charitable Trust of the Rotary Club of Kakaria - 2–
The Assessee has raised the following grounds of Appeal:-
In law and in facts and circumstances of the Appellant case, the learned Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals)
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Md. Akhtar Ansari, Proprietor Of M/S Indian Associates vs. State Of Jharkhand, Through Commissioner Of State Tax, Commercial Tax Dept.Jharkhand · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S. Amarjothi Granites (INDIA) PVT. LTD., Berhampur, Ganjam vs. The Commissioner, Commercial Tax And GST, Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S. Mishka Steels LLP And Anr. vs. The Superintendent Of Central Goods And Service Tax, Cx, Range-Ii, Behala Div. And Ors.Calcutta · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Gujarat Co-Operative Milk Marketing Federation Limited vs. Union Of INDIAGujarat · 14 Oct 2026
- Ramesh K Devadiga vs. Khernagar Nandadeep Co Operative Housing Society LTDBombay · 14 Oct 2026