VARSHA GANESH KULKARNI,MUMBAI vs. ITO, WARD 2(1), NASHIK, NASHIK
What were the facts?
Assessees received compensation under the BSNL Voluntary Retirement Scheme, 2019. They initially offered a portion to tax after claiming exemption under Section 10(10C) and later claimed the entire amount as exempt under Section 10(10B). The CIT(A) dismissed their appeals due to delay.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The tribunal held that the compensation received under the BSNL VRS-2019 is in the nature of retrenchment compensation and is exempt from tax under Section 10(10B) of the Income Tax Act. The delay in filing appeals before the CIT(A) was condoned.
What were the issues?
Whether compensation received under BSNL VRS-2019 is exempt under Section 10(10B) and if the delay in filing appeals before CIT(A) should be condoned.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PUNE BENCH “A”, PUNE BEFORE SHRI PAVAN KUMAR GADALE, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI Dr. DIPAK P. RIPOTE, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Sr. ITA Nos. A.Y.
Appellant Respondent No. 1 3078/PUN/2026 2020-21 Varsha Ganesh Kulkarni, ITO, Ward-2(1), C/o. Padvekar Law Chambers, Nashik 408, Maker Bhavan No. 3, 21, New Marine Lines, Mumbai-400020 PAN : AJCPK4266D 2 3079/PUN/2026 2021-22 Varsha Ganesh Kulkarni, ITO, Ward-2(1), C/o. Padvekar Law Chambers, Nashik 408, Maker Bhavan No. 3, 21, New Marine Lines, Mumbai-400020 PAN : AJCPK4266D 3 3100/PUN/2026 2020-21 Surendra Madhusudan Langade, ITO, Ward-4, C/o. Padvekar Law Chambers, Satara 408, Maker Bhavan No. 3, 21, New Marine Lines, Mumbai-400020 PAN : AAKPL8672K 4 3101/PUN/2026 2021-22 Surendra Madhusudan Langade, ITO, Ward-4, C/o. Padvekar Law Chambers, Satara 408, Maker Bhavan No. 3, 21, New Marine Lines, Mumbai-400020 PAN : AAKPL8672K 5 3102/PUN/2026 2020-21 Syedmatin Syedyasin Daimi, ITO, Ward-1, C/o. Padvekar Law Chambers, Latur 408, Maker Bhavan No. 3, 21, New Marine Lines, Mumbai-400020 PAN : AOVPD4433K 6 3103/PUN/2026 2021-22 Syedmatin Syedyasin Daimi, ITO, Ward-1, C/o. Padvekar Law Chambers, Latur 408, Maker Bhavan
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 10(10B)
- Kishorchandra Girdharlal Joshi, Amreli vs Income Tax Officer, Ward 3(1)(4), AmreliITA 613/RJT/2026[2021-22]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
- Shantilal Maganbhai Kalani, Amreli vs Income Tax Officer, Ward 3(1)(4), AmreliITA 559/RJT/2026[2021-22]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
- Shantilal Maganbhai Kalani, Amreli vs Income Tax Officer, Ward 3(1)(4), AmreliITA 558/RJT/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Lakhman Shir, Jamnagar vs Income Tax Officer, Ward 1(2), JamnagarITA 498/RJT/2026[2021-22]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
- Lakhman Shir, Jamnagar vs Income Tax Officer, Ward 1(2), JamnagarITA 497/RJT/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Mbd Alchemie Private Limited vs. Union Of INDIA & Ors.Delhi · 7 Oct 2026
- Asa Corporate Catalyst INDIA Private Limited vs. Union Of INDIA & Ors.Delhi · 7 Oct 2026
- Reliable Accessories Private Limited vs. Sales Tax Officer Class Ii / Avato Ward 61,Zone 5,Delhi & Ors.Delhi · 7 Oct 2026
- M/S Cresent Stationers vs. Sales Tax Officer Class Ii Ward 3 Delhi & Ors.Delhi · 7 Oct 2026
- Drum Roll Advertising Private Limited Vani Sood vs. Commissioner Of Dgst & Ors.Delhi · 7 Oct 2026