MARATHWADA DIOCESAN COUNCIL (CNI),SAMBHAJINAGAR vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTION), PUNE
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal condoned the delay in filing the appeal and, considering the interest of justice, restored the issue to the CIT(Exemption). The assessee was granted one final opportunity to submit the required details to the satisfaction of the CIT(Exemption).
What were the facts?
The assessee's application for registration under Section 12A was rejected by the CIT(Exemption) due to non-compliance with notices requesting verification of activities and compliance with other laws. The assessee claimed the non-compliance was due to an employee's mistake and sought an opportunity to submit the required details.
What were the issues?
Whether the CIT(Exemption) was justified in rejecting the registration application for non-compliance, and if the assessee should be granted a final opportunity to provide the required information.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, PUNE BENCH “B”, PUNE
PER R.K. PANDA, VP:
This appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order dated 09.09.2025 of the Ld. CIT(Exemption), Pune rejecting the application for grant of registration u/s 12A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’).
There is a delay of 144 days in filing of the appeal before the Tribunal for which the assessee has filed a condonation application along with an affidavit explaining the reasons for such delay. It has been explained that due to an accident met by the concerned CA he was admitted in a hospital for a longer period. The assessee has filed the necessary medical reports to substantiating the above. After
2 considering the contents of the condonation application fi
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 12A
- Desire Foundation, Jaipur vs Income Tax Officer, JaipurITA 1646/JPR/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Sanskardham Nandan, Mehsana vs CIT(Exemption), AhmedabadITA 2980/AHD/2026[2025-26]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2025-26
- Global University Foundation, Hyderabad vs CIT(Exemption), HyderabadITA 777/HYD/2026[2026-27]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2026-27
- Global University Foundation, Hyderabad vs CIT(Exemption), HyderabadITA 776/HYD/2026[2026-27]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2026-27
- Shiva Shiksha Samiti, Deendayal Puram, Up… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward-Exemption, Agra…ITA 415/AGR/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Jharkhand Contractors Association Thro Its President- Pramod Kumar vs. Bharat Coking Coal LTD. Thro Its Chairman Cum Managing DirectorJharkhand · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Isc Processors Private Limited vs. Superintendent,Range-Iv, Burrabazar Div, CGST And Cx, Kolkata (N) Commissionerate And AnrCalcutta · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Raashi Constructions vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of Commercial TaxesKarnataka · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Bidasaria Fenster Solutions vs. The State Of BiharPatna · 13 Oct 2026
- Amit Agency vs. Commissioner, CGST And CxPatna · 13 Oct 2026