BHAVESH HARIBHAI MUNDIYA,RAJKOT vs. ITO WD 2(2)(1), RKT, RAJKOT
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal restored the matter to the Assessing Officer for fresh adjudication, allowing the assessee an opportunity to present his case on merits. The consequential penalty proceedings were also set aside and restored for fresh consideration.
What were the facts?
The assessee's income was assessed by adding Rs. 4,30,77,687/- as unexplained money based on information regarding accommodation entries. The assessee's appeal before the CIT(A) was dismissed due to delay, attributed to the demise and illness of his father.
What were the issues?
Whether the assessee should be granted an opportunity to present his case on merits before the Assessing Officer, and whether the penalty proceedings are sustainable in light of the quantum appeal being restored.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 147,Section 148,Section 142(1),Section 69A,Section 271(1)(c)
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Rajkot Bench, Rajkot
Before: Dr. Arjun Lal Saini & Shri Sonjoy Sarma
Per, Shri Sonjoy Sarma, JM: Captioned both these appeals are preferred by the same assessee against separate orders of the Ld. Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) [hereinafter referred to as “Ld.CIT(A)”], dated 08.04.2026, arising out of separate proceedings for the same assessment year. ITA No. 865/Rjt/2026 is directed against the order of the Ld. CIT(A) dated 08.04.2026, arising from the assessment order dated 18.05.2023 passed under section 147 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 ("the Act"). ITA No. 765/Rjt/2026 i
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 147
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Tarunaben Maganlal Bhut, Navagam vs ITO Ward 2(2)(1), RajkotITA 673/RJT/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Md. Akhtar Ansari, Proprietor Of M/S Indian Associates vs. State Of Jharkhand, Through Commissioner Of State Tax, Commercial Tax Dept.Jharkhand · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S. Amarjothi Granites (INDIA) PVT. LTD., Berhampur, Ganjam vs. The Commissioner, Commercial Tax And GST, Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S. Mishka Steels LLP And Anr. vs. The Superintendent Of Central Goods And Service Tax, Cx, Range-Ii, Behala Div. And Ors.Calcutta · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Gujarat Co-Operative Milk Marketing Federation Limited vs. Union Of INDIAGujarat · 14 Oct 2026
- Ramesh K Devadiga vs. Khernagar Nandadeep Co Operative Housing Society LTDBombay · 14 Oct 2026