PURNIA TRADERS,MARKETING YARD,GULABBAGH vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX (APPEALS), PURNIA
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal set aside the CIT(A)'s ex-parte orders and remanded the matter back for fresh adjudication. The CIT(A) was directed to provide an opportunity of being heard to the assessee.
What were the facts?
The assessee's appeals against the assessment and penalty orders were dismissed by the CIT(A) ex-parte. The assessee did not participate in the first appellate proceedings.
What were the issues?
Whether the CIT(A) erred in passing ex-parte orders without providing an opportunity of being heard to the assessee and without deciding all grounds of appeal on merits.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, PATNA “DB” BENCH
Before: SHRI YOGESH KUMAR U.S. & SHRI RAKESH MISHRA
PER YOGESH KUMAR U.S., JUDICIAL MEMBER:
These two Appeals are filed by the Assessee against the order of the NFAC, Delhi (‘Ld. CIT(A)’ for short) dated 13.05.2026, passed u/s 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (“the Act”, for short) for the Assessment Year 2015-16, wherein the Ld. CIT(A) has confirmed the Assessment Order as well as the order of penalty respectively.
Brief facts of the case are that, Assessment Orders came to be passed u/s 147 r.w.s. 144 r.w.s. 144B of the Act on 16.01.2024 by making certain additions. Pursuant to the Assessment Order, a penalty proceeding has been initiated and an order of penalty came to be passed on 03.06.2024. Assessee preferred two Ap
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 147
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Tarunaben Maganlal Bhut, Navagam vs ITO Ward 2(2)(1), RajkotITA 673/RJT/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Utkal Highways, Bidanasi vs. Union Of INDIAOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- Pradeep Kumar Behera vs. Superintendent CGST And Central Excise., CuttackOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- Manas Behera vs. Commissioner, CT And GST Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- Pramod Kumar Nayak vs. Superintendent, CGST And Central Excise, KendraparaOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- Nirmal Kumar Sharma S/O Ram Swroop Sharma vs. Union Of INDIARajasthan · 16 Oct 2026