KUNTA SRINIVAS REDDY,HYDERABAD vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE -1(3), HYDERABAD

ITA 553/HYD/2026Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad23 September 2026AY 2022-2318 pages
AI SummaryDismissed

What were the facts?

A search operation led to the reopening of the assessee's case. The Assessing Officer made an addition of Rs. 2,70,70,600/-. The CIT(A) deleted this addition, granting partial relief to the assessee.

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal held that the reopening of assessment and the approval for reassessment were in accordance with the law, rejecting the assessee's challenges to the validity of the sanction and approval.

What were the issues?

The key issues were the validity of the reassessment proceedings, including the sanction for issuing notice under Section 148 and the approval for the reassessment order under Section 148B.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 132,Section 147,Section 148,Section 148B,Section 149,Section 151,Section 271DA,Section 270A,Section 271AAC(1),Section 69A,Section 115BBE

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad ‘ A ‘ Bench, Hyderabad

PER BENCH : The captioned appeals filed by the assessee are directed against the separate orders of the learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) - 12, Hyderabad, dated 31.01.2026, pertaining to the assessment years 2018-19 to 2023-24. Since common issues are involved in all the

The order continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

Create a free accountSign in

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

More judgments on Section 132

All 14,286 judgments and leading authorities on Section 132 →

Latest GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →