KIRAN KUMAR GRANDHE,HYDERABAD vs. ITO, (INT TAXN)-1, HYDERABAD
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that an appellate authority can entertain a claim for deduction under Section 54F even if not made in the return of income or before the Assessing Officer, provided there is a reasonable explanation. The issue was restored to the Assessing Officer for verification of eligibility.
What were the facts?
The assessee, a non-resident, did not file a return of income for AY 2020-21. The case was reopened, and the Assessing Officer proposed an addition of Rs. 1,00,00,000/- as short-term capital gain. The DRP directed that the gain be treated as long-term capital gain of Rs. 49,25,389/-.
What were the issues?
Whether the assessee can claim deduction under Section 54F for the first time before the appellate tribunal when it was not claimed in the return of income or before the lower authorities.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 147,Section 148,Section 143(2),Section 144C,Section 139,Section 54F,Section 254
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad ‘B‘ Bench, Hyderabad
Before: Shri Ravish SoodShri Madhusudan Sawdia
Per Madhusudan Sawdia, A.M.:
This appeal is filed by Shri Kiran Kumar Grandhe (“the assessee”), feeling aggrieved by the assessment order passed by the Assessing Officer under section 147 r.w.s. 144C(13) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (“the Act”) for A.Y. 2020- 21, dated 28.01.2026 as per the directions of the Learned CIT (DRP)-1, Bengaluru-2 (“Ld. DRP”) dated 27.12.2025. 2. The assessee has raised the following grounds of appeal:
“1. On the facts and circumstances of the case , the order pass
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 147
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Tarunaben Maganlal Bhut, Navagam vs ITO Ward 2(2)(1), RajkotITA 673/RJT/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Chandan Kumar Bathual vs. Superintendent, CGST And Central Excise, Cuttack-Iii Range, CuttackOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Manoranjan Sadangi vs. Superintendent, CGST And Central Excise, Gopalpur Range, GanjamOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Bijaya Kumar Parekh vs. State Tax Officer, CT And GST Balangir Circle, BalangirOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Puspanjali Bhuyan vs. The Commissioner Of CT And GST, OdishaOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S A2Z Infra Engineering LTD vs. Union Of INDIA And Ors.Calcutta · 14 Oct 2026