GAURAV TAYAL,INDORE vs. THE ITO, WARD, SENDHWA, SENDHWA
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the assessee had provided sufficient documentary evidence to establish the purchase, holding, sale, and receipt of sale proceeds through banking channels. The revenue failed to provide any specific material to link the assessee with an accommodation entry arrangement.
What were the facts?
The assessee sold shares of Global Capital Markets Ltd. and declared Long Term Capital Gain (LTCG). The Assessing Officer (AO) reopened the assessment and added the sale proceeds under Section 68 as unexplained cash credit, which was partly confirmed by the CIT(A).
What were the issues?
Whether the sale proceeds of shares can be treated as unexplained cash credit under Section 68 when the assessee has provided documentary evidence of purchase, holding, and sale through a recognized stock exchange. Whether the reopening of assessment was valid.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, INDORE BENCH, INDORE
Before: SHRI PARESH M. JOSHI & SHRI ARVIND SONI
PER ARVIND SONI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER:
This appeal has been filed by the assessee against the order dated 28.01.2026 passed by the National Faceless
Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi [hereinafter referred to as "the ld. CIT(A)"] for Assessment Year 2012-13 arising out of assessment order framed under section 147 read with section 143(3) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 ("the Act").
Gaurav Tayal
The brief facts of the case are that the assessee filed the return of income for Assessment Year 2012-13 on 25.02.2013 declaring total income of Rs.3,33,760/-. The return of income as filed as processed under section 143(1)
of the Income Tax Act on 19.04.2013. On the basis of information as received from Pr. CI
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 147
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Tarunaben Maganlal Bhut, Navagam vs ITO Ward 2(2)(1), RajkotITA 673/RJT/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
Latest GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Ankil Jagdishchandra Kholwadwala vs. Union Of INDIA And AnrBombay · 22 Oct 2026
- Imtiyaz Shaikh Z Chorlekar vs. Salman ShaikhBombay · 21 Oct 2026
- S. Nithyananda vs. State Of KarnatakaKarnataka · 17 Oct 2026
- Venkadeswara Grill Works vs. The Joint Commissioner (St)Madras · 16 Oct 2026
- Mufti Clothing And Co vs. The Assistant Commissioner (St)Madras · 16 Oct 2026