SOPNA RANI PANDHY,UTTAR PRADESH vs. INCOME TAX, OFFICER, WARD 2(2)(3),GHAZIABAD, GHAZIABAD
What were the facts?
The assessee acquired a plot of land in 2002 for Rs. 6,76,000 and paid an advance of Rs. 25,000. The Assessing Officer made an addition of Rs. 55,22,000 under section 56(2)(vii) which was upheld by the CIT(A)/NFAC.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal is examining the addition made under section 56(2)(vii) concerning the acquisition of a plot of land. The assessee's counsel is arguing against this addition.
What were the issues?
The primary issue is the validity of the addition made under section 56(2)(vii) on the acquisition of a plot of land, which was previously agreed upon and partially paid for.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH ‘G’, NEW DELHI
Before: SHRI SATBEER SINGH GODARA & SHRI SANJAY AWASTHI
PER SATBEER SINGH GODARA, JM:
This assessee’s appeal for assessment year 2016-17, arises against the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)/National Faceless Appeal Centre [in short, the “CIT(A)/NFAC”], Delhi’s DIN & Order No. ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2026-27/1089133936(1) dated 21.05.2026, involving proceedings u/s 147 r.w.s. 144 r.w.s. 144B of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’); respectively.
Heard both the parties. Case file perused.
Learned counsel invites our attention to the assessee’s second substantive ground raised in the instant appeal seeking to reverse section 56(2)(vii) addition of Rs. 55,22,000/-; made in the Assessing Officer’s assessment order, as uphe
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 56(2)(vii)
- Hasumatiben Harkishanbhai Parmar, Surat vs ITO, Ward-2(3)(2), SuratITA 1467/SRT/2025[2015-16]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026AY 2015-16
- Naresh Kumar, Gurgaon, Haryana vs PCIT, JaipurITA 209/JPR/2024[2019-20]Status: Disposed28 Sept 2026AY 2019-20
- Anwar Hussain Karam Hussain Khan, Thane vs Income Tax Officer, Ward 1(1), ThaneITA 3191/MUM/2026[2016-17]Status: Disposed23 Sept 2026AY 2016-17
- Zia Salim Desai, Mumbai vs ITO 23(3)(1), MumbaiITA 1186/MUM/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed15 Sept 2026AY 2017-18
- Hukam Chand, Himachal Pradesh vs ITO, ParwanooITA 1662/CHANDI/2025[AY 2013-14]Status: Disposed8 Sept 2026
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Legend Distilleries PVT. LTD. vs. State Of ChhattisgarhChhattisgarh · 5 Oct 2026
- Legend Distilleries PVT LTD vs. State Of ChhattisgarhChhattisgarh · 5 Oct 2026
- Scottmen Alco Bev Fillers PVT LTD vs. State Of ChhattisgarhChhattisgarh · 5 Oct 2026
- Legend Distilieries PVT LTD. vs. State Of ChhattisgarhChhattisgarh · 5 Oct 2026
- Legend Distilleries PVT LTD vs. State Of ChhattisgarhChhattisgarh · 5 Oct 2026