M/S GANPAT PANNALAL,HARDA vs. NATIONAL FACELESS ASSESSMENT CENTRE, DELHI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the addition of Rs. 37,01,999/- was not justified as the opening cash balance was a brought-forward amount from audited accounts and the Assessing Officer did not provide material to prove it was unexplained income for the relevant year.
What were the facts?
The assessee's assessment for AY 2016-17 was reopened based on reasons related to increased partner capital and unexplained cash balance. The Assessing Officer made an addition of Rs. 37,01,999/- due to the difference in opening and closing cash balances.
What were the issues?
Whether the reassessment was validly initiated and if the addition on account of cash balance difference was justified without rejecting the books of account.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, INDORE BENCH, INDORE
Before: SHRI PARESH M. JOSHI & SHRI ARVIND SONI
PER ARVIND SONI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER:
This appeal has been filed by the assessee against the order dated 22.09.2025 passed by the National Faceless
Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi [hereinafter referred to as "the ld. CIT(A)"] for Assessment Year 2016-17 arising out of assessment order framed under section 147 read with section 144B of the Income-tax Act, 1961 ("the Act").
M/s Ganpat Pannalal
The brief facts of the case are that the assessee filed the return of income for Assessment Year 2016-17 on 27.03.2018 declaring total income of Rs.23,41,800/-. The case was selected for limited scrutiny u/s 143(3) of the Income
Tax Act 1961. Notice u/s 143(2) issued ITO-1 Har
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 147
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Tarunaben Maganlal Bhut, Navagam vs ITO Ward 2(2)(1), RajkotITA 673/RJT/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Ramesh K Devadiga And Ors vs. Khernagar Nandadeep Co-Operative Housing Society LTD And OrsBombay · 14 Oct 2026
- Permender Singh vs. Union Of INDIA And Ors.Calcutta · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Abdhish Dhal Samanta, Bhubaneswar vs. Chief Commissioner, CT And GST, Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Kniit Net Industries Private Limited, Khurda vs. Superintendent Of CGST And Central Excise, Bhubaneswar Ii CircleOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Maa Swarnapai Chemicals (Opc) Private Limited, Cuttack vs. Sales Tax Officer, Cuttack IOrissa · 14 Oct 2026