M/S ENERGY DEVELOPMENT COMPANY LIMITED,WEST BENGAL, KOLKATA vs. DCIT /ACIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, GURGAON, HARYANA, GURGAON
What were the facts?
The assessee filed appeals against assessment orders passed under Section 153A following a search. The assessee argued that assessments for certain years were beyond the permissible block period, lacked jurisdiction due to unsatisfied provisos, or were time-barred. No incriminating material was found during the search.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the assessment for AY 2011-12 was beyond the permissible block period under Section 153A. It also found that additions for AYs 2013-14 and 2014-15 did not constitute 'assets' as defined, and that assessments for unabated years lacked incriminating material. The assessment for AY 2020-21 was found to be barred by limitation.
What were the issues?
Whether assessments under Section 153A were validly made within the prescribed block period and time limits, and if additions were based on incriminating material found during the search.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 153A,Section 153B,Section 143(3),Section 56(2)(viia),Section 56(2)(x)
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH ‘B’: NEW DELHI
Before: SHRI S.RIFAUR RAHMAN & MS. MADHUMITA ROY
PER S.RIFAURRAHMAN,AM:
These appeals are filed by the assesseeagainst the order passed by the ld. Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals)-3, Gurgaon [for short ‘ld. CIT (A)] dated 17.09.2026 and dated 21.11.2025 for the Assessment Years 2011-12, 2013-14 to 2020-21. 2. Since the issues are common and the appeals are connected, hence the same are heard together and being disposed off by this common order.
At the time of hearing, ld. AR of the assessee with the permission of the Bench brought to our notice relevant facts on record and his submissions. He submi
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 153A
- Veera Mani Kumari Vattikooti, Hyderabad vs ITO, Ward -11(1), HyderabadITA 1218/HYD/2026[2016-17]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2016-17
- Veera Mani Kumar Vatti Kooti, Hyderabad vs ITO, Ward -11(1), HyderabadITA 1069/HYD/2026[2016-17]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2016-17
- Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax… vs M/S. Kalindi Ispat Pvt. Ltd., BilaspurITA 80/JAB/2018[2015-16]Status: Disposed6 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax… vs M/S. Kalindi Ispat Pvt. Ltd., BilaspurITSSA 22/JAB/2018[2014-15]Status: Disposed6 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax… vs M/S. Kalindi Ispat Pvt. Ltd., BilaspurITSSA 21/JAB/2018[2013-14]Status: Disposed6 Oct 2026AY 2013-14
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S S M Agri Exports Private Limited vs. Sales Tax Officer/ Avato Ward-52, Zone-3, DelhiDelhi · 7 Oct 2026
- Reliable Accessories Private Limited vs. Sales Tax Officer Class Ii / Avato Ward 61,Zone 5,Delhi & Ors.Delhi · 7 Oct 2026
- Global Enterprises vs. Union Of INDIA & Ors.Delhi · 7 Oct 2026
- Shakuntlam Associates Through Its Proprietor Mr Ashok Aggarwal vs. Goods And Services Tax Council Through The Secretary GST Council Secretariat & Ors.Delhi · 7 Oct 2026
- Rachit Enterprises vs. Union Of INDIA & Ors.Delhi · 7 Oct 2026