DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(2), KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. DHANCOT FIBRES PRIVATE LIMITED, KOLKATA
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the tax effect was below the monetary limit prescribed by the CBDT circular. As the revenue did not clearly suggest an applicable exception clause, the appeal was dismissed.
What were the facts?
The revenue filed an appeal against the CIT(A)'s order. The tax effect involved in the appeal was Rs. 46,53,992/-, which was below the prescribed threshold limit of Rs. 60,00,000/- as per CBDT circulars. The revenue failed to clearly specify which exception clause was applicable.
What were the issues?
Whether the revenue's appeal should be entertained when the tax effect is below the prescribed monetary limit and no specific exception clause from the CBDT circular is clearly invoked.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “A” BENCH, KOLKATA
Before: SHRI GEORGE MATHAN & SHRI GOPALAN GURUSAMY
Per George Mathan, JM: This is an appeal filed by the revenue against the order of the CIT(A)- 20, Kolkata [hereinafter referred to as the ‘CIT(A)’] in appeal no.CIT(A), Kolkata-20/10544/2013-14 dated 26.09.2025 for the assessment year 2014-15. 2. Miss Vidhi Ladhi, AR represented on behalf of the assessee and Shri Subrahmanyam Tota, Sr. DR represented on behalf of the revenue.
The ld. AR on behalf of the assessee has submitted that the tax effect involved in the instant appeal filed by the revenue is Rs.46,53,992/- which is evident from the grounds raised by the revenue and the same is below the prescribed threshold limit of Rs.60,00,000/- as per latest CBDT’s circular no.09/2024 dated 17.09.2024. It was t
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Ramesh K Devadiga And Ors vs. Khernagar Nandadeep Co-Operative Housing Society LTD And OrsBombay · 14 Oct 2026
- Permender Singh vs. Union Of INDIA And Ors.Calcutta · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Abdhish Dhal Samanta, Bhubaneswar vs. Chief Commissioner, CT And GST, Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Kniit Net Industries Private Limited, Khurda vs. Superintendent Of CGST And Central Excise, Bhubaneswar Ii CircleOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Maa Swarnapai Chemicals (Opc) Private Limited, Cuttack vs. Sales Tax Officer, Cuttack IOrissa · 14 Oct 2026