MUKHTAR AHMED,DELHI vs. DCIT, CIRCLE 61(1), DELHI, DELHI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal found that the NFAC's ex-parte order was not justified as it failed to decide the issue on merits. Therefore, the appeal was restored to the NFAC for a fresh adjudication.
What were the facts?
The assessee's appeal arose from an ex-parte order passed by the National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC). The NFAC had decided the issue without adjudicating on merits or providing independent findings.
What were the issues?
Whether the NFAC was justified in passing an ex-parte order without adjudicating the issue on merits.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI
Before: SHRI MAHAVIR SINGH & SHRI M BALAGANESH
आयकर अपीलीय अधिकरण, दिल्ली पीठें, नई दिल्ली INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, DELHI BENCHES, NEW DELHI BENCH: A BEFORE SHRI MAHAVIR SINGH, VICE PRESIDENT AND SHRI M BALAGANESH, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA 892/DEL/2026 (निर्धारण वर्ा/Assessment Year: 2019-20) MUKHTAR AHMED DCIT, CIRCLE 61(1), DELHI C-9/69, YAMUNA VIHAR, YAMUNA CIVIC CENTRE,NEW DELHI VIHAR, NORTH EAST DELHI, NEW DELHI-110002, DELHI Vs. YAMUNA VIHAR S.O, 110053, DELHI, INDIA, NEW DELHI-110053, DELHI अपीलधर्थी Appellant प्रत्यर्थी Respondent
Permanent Account Number of Assessee: AEOPA5914R
अपीलधर्थी द्वारा/Appellant represented by: Sh Shivam Jain,ADV प्रत्यर्थी द्वारा/Respondent represented by: Sh Balkishan Gopal ,SR DR
सुनवाई की तारीख / Date of conclusion of hearing: 07-Sep-2026 घोषणा की तारीख / Date of pronouncement: 07-Sep-2026 आदेश / ORDER PER SHRI M BALAGANESH, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER: The appeal in ITA No.892/Del/2026 for AY 2019-20, arises out of the 1. order of the ld National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi [hereinafter referred to as ‘ld. CIT(A)’, in short] dated 06.01.2026 against the order of assessment passed u/s 147 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’) dated 30.03.2025 by the Assessing Officer, ACIT, Circle61(1), Delhi (hereinafter referred to as ‘ld. AO’).
ITA 892/DEL/2026 MUKHTAR AHMED
The preliminary issue to be decided in this appeal is as to whether the 2. Learned NFAC was justified in passing an exparte order in the facts and circumstances of the instant case.
We have heard the rival submissions and perused the materials 3. available on record. Further, on going through the grounds raised by the assessee and the order of the National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), we find that the ld NFAC had decided the issue ex parte without adjudicating the issue on merits giving its independent finding. Hence, in the interest of justice and fairplay we deem it fit and appropriate to restore this appeal to file of ld NFAC for de novo adjudication in accordance with law. Needless to mention the assessee be given reasonable opportunity of being heard. The assessee is directed to cooperate with ld NFAC for expeditious disposal of the appeal by not taking unwarranted adjournments. Hence, the grounds raised by the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes.
In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical 4. purposes.
Order pronounced in the open court on 07-Sep-2026.
-Sd/- -Sd/- MAHAVIR SINGH M BALAGANESH VICE PRESIDENT ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Delhi Dated: 17/09/2026 AK Keot Copy to: MUKHTAR AHMED, C-9/69, YAMUNA VIHAR, YAMUNA VIHAR, NORTH EAST DELHI, YAMUNA VIHAR S.O, 1 110053, DELHI, INDIA, NEW DELHI-110053, DELHI
ITA 892/DEL/2026 MUKHTAR AHMED
DCIT, CIRCLE 61(1), DELHI, 2 CIVIC CENTRE,NEW DELHI, NEW DELHI-110002, DELHI 3 THE PCIT / CIT, 4 THE D.R., ITAT, DELHI BENCH 5 GUARD FILE
More judgments on Section 147
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Tarunaben Maganlal Bhut, Navagam vs ITO Ward 2(2)(1), RajkotITA 673/RJT/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Imtiyaz Shaikh Z Chorlekar vs. Salman ShaikhBombay · 21 Oct 2026
- S. Nithyananda vs. State Of KarnatakaKarnataka · 17 Oct 2026
- Ritik vs. State Of M.P.Madhya Pradesh · 16 Oct 2026
- Venkadeswara Grill Works vs. The Joint Commissioner (St)Madras · 16 Oct 2026
- Mufti Clothing And Co vs. The Assistant Commissioner (St)Madras · 16 Oct 2026