SONI KUMAR,KOLKATA vs. DCIT, CIRCLE-1, JAMSHEDPUR
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that since the assessee failed to appear before both the revenue authorities, legal issues cannot be raised at this stage. The case is remanded to the Assessing Officer to allow the assessee to submit all documents and material.
What were the facts?
The assessee, a retail dealer of Amul Milk, failed to file her income tax return for AY 2018-19 due to personal reasons. The Assessing Officer made additions for cash deposits and interest income, passing an ex-parte order. The assessee also failed to appear before the CIT(A).
What were the issues?
Whether the assessee's failure to appear before the revenue authorities bars them from raising legal grounds before the ITAT, and whether the case should be remanded for fresh adjudication.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 147,Section 144,Section 144B,Section 69A,Section 250,Section 148A,Section 142(1),Section 133(6)
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, RANCHI BENCH, RANCHI
Before: SHRI RATNESH NANDAN SAHAY & SMT. RAJANI GUDURI
PER: BENCH
This appeal is filed by the appellant/assessee aggrieved by the ex parte order of the ld. CIT(A), NFAC, Delhi in Appeal No. NFAC/2017-18/10242492 dated 13/03/2026 in DIN & Order No. ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2025-26/1087330437(1) passed under Section 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short, the Act) against the order in ITBA/AST/S/147/2022-23/1051183250(1) dated 23/03/2022 passed under Section 147 r.w.s 144 r.w.s 144B of the Act, by the ld. Assessing Officer, NFAC, Delhi for the A.Y. 2018-19. 2. The appeal of the assessee
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 147
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Tarunaben Maganlal Bhut, Navagam vs ITO Ward 2(2)(1), RajkotITA 673/RJT/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Dillip Kumar Behera vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, Mayurbhanj CircleOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S. Kalinga Paper Mart, Sundergarh vs. Commissioner Of CT And GST, CuttackOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Kabita Nayak vs. Chief Commissioner, CGST, Central Excise And Customs, KhurdaOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Swastika Ingot PVT.LTD, Sundargarh vs. The Addl Commissioner, GST And Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S Basudev Logistics, Jagatsinghpur vs. Principal Commissioner, CGST And Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 15 Oct 2026