SHRI SHYAM JAN KALYANARTH MANUSHRI CHARITABLE TRUST,SIKAR vs. ITO WARD-1, SIKAR, SIKAR
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted that the order rejecting the Section 12AB registration was set aside, and subsequently, registration was granted. Therefore, the CIT(A)'s order was not sustainable.
What were the facts?
The assessee trust had provisional registration but its application for regular registration under Section 12AB was rejected. The Assessing Officer denied exemption under Section 11 and disallowed cash expenses. The CIT(A) confirmed these additions.
What were the issues?
Whether the assessee trust is eligible for exemption under Section 11 when its regular registration under Section 12AB was initially rejected but later granted. Whether cash expenses are allowable.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 11,Section 12A(1)(ac)(vi),Section 12AB,Section 40A(3)
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, JAIPUR “SMC” BENCH, JAIPUR
Before: SHRI KULDIP SINGH & SHRI PRAKASH, ACCOUNTANCT MEMBER
PER : KULDIP SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMBER:-
The Appellant, Shri Shyam Jan Kalanarth Manushri Charitable Trust by filing the present appeal, sought to set aside the impugned order dated 13.11.2025 passed by the National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi [hereinafter referred to as the ‘CIT(A)’] qua assessment year 2023-24 on the grounds inter-alia that:- “1. The Ld. CIT(A) has erred and was not just and proper on the facts of the case and in law in not allowing the deduction u/s 11, where the assessee is a provisionally registered trust at the time of assessment proceedings.
I.T.A No. 192/JPR/2026 Page No 2
The Ld. CIT(A) has erred and was not just and prop
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 11
- Desire Foundation, Jaipur vs Income Tax Officer, JaipurITA 1646/JPR/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Mata Lachmi Rotary Charitable Society… vs Income Tax Officer, Exemption Ward - 1…ITA 310/RJT/2025[2022-23]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2022-23
- Shiva Shiksha Samiti, Deendayal Puram, Up… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward-Exemption, Agra…ITA 415/AGR/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- Sweekar, Nagpur vs ITO Ward 1, Exemp, NagpurITA 531/NAG/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Sweekar, Nagpur vs ITO Ward 1, Exemp, NagpurITA 530/NAG/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- J M Mhatre Infra PVT. LTD Thr. Authorized Chetanj Mhatre vs. Union Of INDIA Thr. Secretary And OrsBombay · 14 Oct 2026
- J M Mhatre Infra PVT. LTD Thr. Authorized Chetan J. Mhatre vs. Union Of INDIA Thr. Secretary And OrsBombay · 14 Oct 2026
- Namita Behera vs. Commissioner Of CT And GST, CuttackOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Ratul Boro vs. The Union Of INDIA And 4 OrsGauhati · 14 Oct 2026
- Jashwant Sharma vs. The Union Of INDIA And A4 OrsGauhati · 14 Oct 2026