PRIYADARSHINI SOLAR MISSION AND WATER SAVING SANSTHAN,JAIPUR vs. CIT (EXEMPTION), JAIPUR, JAIPUR
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the appellant was not provided with an adequate opportunity of being heard by the CIT(E) and that their right to be heard was violated. Therefore, the impugned orders were set aside to be decided afresh.
What were the facts?
The appellant applied for registration under Section 12A/12AB and approval under Section 80G of the Income Tax Act. The CIT(E) rejected these applications, citing non-registration with the Rajasthan Public Trust Act, non-compliance, and non-genuineness of activities.
What were the issues?
Whether the CIT(E) erred in rejecting the applications for registration and approval without providing an adequate opportunity of being heard to the appellant.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, JAIPUR “B” BENCH, JAIPUR
Before: SHRI KULDIP SINGH & SHRI PRAKASH, ACCOUNTANCT MEMBER
PER : KULDIP SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMBER:-
The Appellant, Priyadarshini Solar Mission and Water Saving Sansthan by filing aforesaid interconnected appeals, sought to set aside the impugned orders both dated 22.02.2026 passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption), Jaipur [hereinafter referred to as the ‘CIT(E)’] on the grounds inter-alia that:- I.T.A No. 1178 &1179/JPR/2026 Page No 2 Priyadarshini solar Mission and Water Saving Sansthan
“1. 1. The impugned order u/s 80G (5) (ii) dt. 22.02.2026 by the Ld. CIT(E) is illegal, bad in law, barred by limitation, without juri iction, against the principles of natural justice and void ab-initio
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 12A
- Desire Foundation, Jaipur vs Income Tax Officer, JaipurITA 1646/JPR/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Sanskardham Nandan, Mehsana vs CIT(Exemption), AhmedabadITA 2980/AHD/2026[2025-26]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2025-26
- Global University Foundation, Hyderabad vs CIT(Exemption), HyderabadITA 777/HYD/2026[2026-27]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2026-27
- Global University Foundation, Hyderabad vs CIT(Exemption), HyderabadITA 776/HYD/2026[2026-27]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2026-27
- Shiva Shiksha Samiti, Deendayal Puram, Up… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward-Exemption, Agra…ITA 415/AGR/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Hindustan Coca-Cola Beverages PVT. LTD. vs. The Commissioner, CGST And Cx, Dibrugarh And AnrGauhati · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Shree Sushruta Health Services Private Limited vs. The Union Of INDIAPatna · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Rst Batteries vs. Deputy Commissioner CGST Delhi West & Ors.Delhi · 14 Oct 2026
- Dr.Sunil Kumar Padhi vs. The Chief Commissioner, GST And Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- N.K Fashion Through It Proprietor Mr. Narender Agarwal vs. Assistant Commissioner Of Central Goods And Service Tax, Delhi EastDelhi · 14 Oct 2026