ISHWAR SINGH RATHORE,JAIPUR, RAJASTHAN vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-3, JAIPUR, JAIPUR, RAJASTHAN
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that in view of the Supreme Court's decision in Checkmate Services P Ltd. vs CIT, no deduction is allowable for employees' contribution to PF and ESI if not deposited within the prescribed limits under the respective acts.
What were the facts?
The assessee claimed deduction for employees' contribution to PF and ESI. The Assessing Officer disallowed this deduction as the payments were made beyond the due dates prescribed under the respective acts, but before the due date of filing the income tax return. The CIT(A) confirmed the disallowance.
What were the issues?
Whether employees' contribution to PF and ESI, deposited after the statutory due date but before the income tax return filing due date, is allowable as a deduction.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, JAIPUR “B” BENCH, JAIPUR
Before: SHRI KULDIP SINGH & SHRI PRAKASH, ACCOUNTANCT MEMBER
PER : KULDIP SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMBER:-
The Appellant, Ishwar Singh Rathore (hereinafter referred to as the ‘assessee’) by filing the present appeal, sought to set aside the impugned order dated 26.03.2025 passed by the National Faceless Appe4al Centre (NFAC), Delhi [hereinafter referred to as the ‘CIT(A)’] qua assessment year 2015-16 on the grounds inter-alia that:- “1. That the learned lower authority below has made addition to income to Rs. 69,83,729/-which is grossly wrong, contrary to the legal provision, unjustified and is based on his own wrong whims and fancies.
I.T.A No. 851/JPR/2025 Page No 2 Ishwar Singh Rathore
2
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 43B
- Vco Consulatatns and Sevices Private… vs ITO, Corporate Ward 3(3), ChennaiITA 2145/CHNY/2025[2019-20]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Siemens Gamesa Renewable Power Private… vs The Dy CIT Circle 8(2)(1), MumbaiITA 8020/MUM/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- Amritvarsha Industries Limited, Ambedkar… vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 6481/DEL/2026[2010-2011]Status: Disposed7 Oct 2026AY 2010-2011
- Karaj Singh, Haryana vs PCIT (Central) Gurgaon, GurgaonITA 642/CHANDI/2026[2022-23]Status: Disposed1 Oct 2026AY 2022-23
- ACIT, Mumbai vs Imp Powers Limited, MumbaiITA 4982/MUM/2025[2012-13]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026AY 2012-13
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Prabhudatta Mishra vs. The Commissioner Of Commercial Taxes And Goods And Services Tax, OdishaOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Rajesh Kumar Gupta vs. Joint Commissioner Of GST (Appeal), Territorial Range, BolangirOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S. Attitude Exim PVT. LTD., Rourkela vs. The Commissioner Of CT And GST, CuttackOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S.Pradeep Kumar Mahapatra, Bhubaneswar vs. Superintendent Bhubaneswar-Iii Circle, CGST Range, BhubaneswarOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Dillip Kumar Behera vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, Mayurbhanj CircleOrissa · 15 Oct 2026