STATE BANK OF INDIA, KOLKATA MAIN BRANCH,KOLKATA vs. INCOME TAX TDS CIRCLE 3(1), KOLKATA
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that LTC is meant for travel within India and foreign travel does not qualify for exemption under Section 10(5). Consequently, the assessee was liable for tax deduction at source on such payments.
What were the facts?
The assessee, State Bank of India, claimed exemption for Leave Travel Concession (LTC) paid to its employees. The Revenue contended that LTC involving foreign travel is not eligible for exemption under Section 10(5) of the Income Tax Act.
What were the issues?
Whether LTC involving foreign travel is eligible for exemption under Section 10(5) of the Income Tax Act and the employer's liability for TDS on such payments.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
ITA No. 1025/KOL/2026 & other appeals State Bank of India IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, ‘SMC’ BENCH, KOLKATA Before Shri Duvvuru RL Reddy, Vice-President (KZ) Assessment Year: 2016-2017 SMECCC-SAR, Howrah, Ward-2(1), Kolkata, 106, Kiran Chandra Singha 10B, Middleton Row, Road, Kolkata-700071 Ganges Garden, Kolkata- 711101 [PAN:AAACS8577K] APPELLANT RESPONDENT
Assessee by : Shri Vikash Saraogi, Advocate Revenue by : Smt. Sima Das Biswas, JCIT, Sr. DR & Assessment Year: 2017-2018 Circle-3(1), Kolkata Block-D, Samriddhi Bhawan, 10B, Middleton Row, 1, Strand Road, Kolkata- Kolkata-700071 700001 [PAN:CALSI2062B] APPELLANT RESPONDENT
Assessee by : Shri Vikash Saraogi, Advocate Revenue by : Smt. Sima Das Biswas, JCIT, Sr. DR & Assessment Year: 2017-2018 Circle-3(1), Kolkata, HOUSE, Kolkata-700016 Kolkata-700071 [TAN:CALSI2072E] APPELLANT RESPONDENT
Assessee by : Shri Vikash Saraogi, Advocate Revenue by : Smt. Sima Das Biswas, JCIT, Sr. DR & Assessment Year: 2017-2018
State Bank of Ind
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 10(5)
- Sbi, (Erstwhile Sbbj), Baran vs ITO (TDS), KotaITA 143/JPR/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed13 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- State Bank of India, Ahmedabad vs ITO, TDS, BharuchITA 536/SRT/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed25 Sept 2026AY 2017-18
- State Bank of India, Ahmedabad vs ITO, TDS, BharuchITA 535/SRT/2026[2016-17]Status: Disposed25 Sept 2026AY 2016-17
- State Bank of India, Ahmedabad vs ITO, TDS Ward 2, SuratITA 472/SRT/2026[2016-17]Status: Disposed25 Sept 2026AY 2016-17
- State Bank of India, Ahmedabad vs ITO, TDS Ward-3, SuratITA 471/SRT/2026[2016-17]Status: Disposed25 Sept 2026AY 2016-17
Latest GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Ankil Jagdishchandra Kholwadwala vs. Union Of INDIA And AnrBombay · 22 Oct 2026
- Imtiyaz Shaikh Z Chorlekar vs. Salman ShaikhBombay · 21 Oct 2026
- S. Nithyananda vs. State Of KarnatakaKarnataka · 17 Oct 2026
- Venkadeswara Grill Works vs. The Joint Commissioner (St)Madras · 16 Oct 2026
- Mufti Clothing And Co vs. The Assistant Commissioner (St)Madras · 16 Oct 2026