AROHAN TRUST,BORPARA vs. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTIONS), KOLKATA
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal found that the CIT(E) had not properly appreciated the evidence and had cancelled the approval without following the procedure under Section 12AB(4). Therefore, the Tribunal set aside the order and remanded the issue back to the CIT(E) for fresh consideration.
What were the facts?
The assessee, Arohan Trust, appealed against the rejection of its applications for registration under Section 12A(1)(ac)(ii) and approval under Section 80G(5)(ii) of the Income Tax Act. The CIT(E) rejected the applications, stating that the trust had obtained previous registration by submitting wrong facts and was thus ineligible.
What were the issues?
Whether the rejection of registration and approval was justified without proper appreciation of evidence and adherence to procedural requirements, particularly Section 12AB(4).
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, KOLKATA ‘A’ BENCH AT KOLKATA
Before: SHRI GEORGE MATHAN & SHRI RAKESH MISHRA
PER RAKESH MISHRA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER:
Both these appeals filed by the assessee are against the separate orders of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions), Kolkata [Ld. 'CIT(E)'] in respect of registration u/s 12A(1)(ac)(ii) and 80G(5)(ii) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 [the 'Act'] dated 25.06.2026. Since the issues in ITA No(s). 2432 & 24
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 12A
- Desire Foundation, Jaipur vs Income Tax Officer, JaipurITA 1646/JPR/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Sanskardham Nandan, Mehsana vs CIT(Exemption), AhmedabadITA 2980/AHD/2026[2025-26]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2025-26
- Global University Foundation, Hyderabad vs CIT(Exemption), HyderabadITA 777/HYD/2026[2026-27]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2026-27
- Global University Foundation, Hyderabad vs CIT(Exemption), HyderabadITA 776/HYD/2026[2026-27]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2026-27
- Shiva Shiksha Samiti, Deendayal Puram, Up… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward-Exemption, Agra…ITA 415/AGR/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Chandan Kumar Bathual vs. Superintendent, CGST And Central Excise, Cuttack-Iii Range, CuttackOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Manoranjan Sadangi vs. Superintendent, CGST And Central Excise, Gopalpur Range, GanjamOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Bijaya Kumar Parekh vs. State Tax Officer, CT And GST Balangir Circle, BalangirOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Puspanjali Bhuyan vs. The Commissioner Of CT And GST, OdishaOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S A2Z Infra Engineering LTD vs. Union Of INDIA And Ors.Calcutta · 14 Oct 2026