MUMBRA SHIKSHAN PRASARAK MANDAL,THANE vs. ITO (EXEMPTIONS) - THANE, DY. CIT (CENTRAL CIRCLE) - 1, THANE, THANE
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the assessment orders were not void-ab-initio and upheld the denial of exemption under Sections 11 and 12 due to non-registration and violations. However, it allowed an additional ground related to Section 10(23C)(iiiad) for further examination.
What were the facts?
The assessee, a trust running educational institutions, failed to file returns of income for multiple assessment years. A survey revealed non-registration under Section 12A/12AA and inflated expenses/suppressed receipts, leading to reassessment proceedings.
What were the issues?
Whether the assessment proceedings were void-ab-initio and whether the assessee was eligible for exemption under Section 10(23C)(iiiad) despite not being registered under Section 12A/12AA.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 147,Section 144,Section 133A,Section 148,Section 11,Section 12,Section 13(1)(c),Section 234A,Section 234B,Section 234C,Section 271(1)(c)
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(8)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- National Thermal Power Co. Ltd. v. CIT5,834 citing229 ITR 283 · 1998 · SC
- CIT v. S. Khader Khan Son581 citing25 Taxmann.com 413 · 2013 · SC
- CIT v. S. Khader Khan Son452 citing300 ITR 157 · 2008 · HC
- Raj Hans Towers (P.) Ltd. v. CIT (86 citing230 Taxmann 567 · 2015 · HC · Read judgment
- 367 (Allahabad) Sudarshan P. Amin v. ACIT40 citing56 Taxmann.com 75 · 2015 · HC
- Dr. S.C. Gupta v. CIT27 citing118 Taxmann 252 · 2001 · HC
- ITO v. Virender Singh Memorial Shiksha Samiti11 citing35 SOT 1 · ITAT
- Kerala)/ 150 ITR 105 (Kerala). S & P Capital IQ (India) (P.) Ltd. v. ACIT5 citing161 Taxmann.com 312 · ITAT
Before: SHRI NARENDER KUMAR CHOUDHRY & SHRI PRABHASH SHANKAR
Heard together (3 matters)
Read from the judgment's own cause title. This page is filed under one of them.
PER PRABHASH SHANKAR [A.M.] :- The above captioned appeals have been filed by the assessee against the orders of even date as passed by the Learned Commissioner of Income- tax, Appeal, CIT(A), Pune-11 [h
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 147
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Tarunaben Maganlal Bhut, Navagam vs ITO Ward 2(2)(1), RajkotITA 673/RJT/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Sanjay Maheshwari vs. Union Of INDIA & Ors.Delhi · 14 Oct 2026
- Iyyanan Eswaran vs. The Appellate Deputy Commissioner (St) (GST)Madras · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Dc Security Services vs. Commissioner Of Central Goods And Services TaxUttarakhand · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Shreekanth Enterprises vs. Joint Commissioner AppealsUttarakhand · 14 Oct 2026
- Sharad Ashok Agarwal vs. State Of Maharashtra Through G.P. And OrsBombay · 14 Oct 2026