THE BOMBAY SOCIETY OF THE FRANCISCAN CLARIST SISTERS OF THE MOST BLESSED SACRAMENT,MUMBAI vs. ITO EXEM WARD 2(4), MUMBAI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the amendment to Section 11(3) is prospective and the assessee was entitled to utilize the accumulated funds within the grace period as per the law existing at the time of accumulation.
What were the facts?
The assessee, a charitable trust, had accumulated funds under Section 11(2) and utilized a portion of it in the subsequent financial year. The CPC disallowed this utilization, citing an amendment to Section 11(3) by the Finance Act, 2022, which reduced the utilization period.
What were the issues?
Whether the amendment to Section 11(3) by the Finance Act, 2022, disallowing utilization of accumulated funds after 5 years, applies prospectively or retrospectively to accumulations made prior to the amendment.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 11(2),Section 11(3),Section 143(1),Section 115BBI
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(3)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- CIT v. Vatika Township Pvt. Ltd.1,558 citing367 ITR 466 · 2014 · SC · Read judgment
- Dadar Digamber Jain Mumukshu Mandal v. Commissioner of Income-tax (Exemption)7 citing176 Taxmann.com 661 · 2025
- Yashwantrao Chavan Maharashtra Open University v. Commissioner of Income-tax (Exemption)7 citing175 Taxmann.com 988 · 2025
Before: SHRI PAWAN SINGH & SMT. RENU JAUHRI
PER RENU JAUHRI [A.M.] :- This appeal is filed by the assessee against the order of the ADDL/JCIT (A)-2 Delhi, [CIT(A)] dated 28.02.2025 passed u/s. 250 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 [hereinafter referred to as “Act”] for Assessment Year 2023-2024. 2. The assessee has raised the following grounds in thi
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 11(2)
- Kammavari Sangham (Regd), Bengaluru vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 1181/BANG/2026[2015-16]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026AY 2015-16
- Indian Roads Congress, New Delhi vs Income Tax Exemption, Ward 1(2), New DelhiITA 1516/DEL/2026[2012 - 2013]Status: Disposed29 Sept 2026
- Rkkr Foundation, Chandigarh vs DCIT, Exemption Circle 1, ChandigarhITA 477/CHANDI/2024[2018-19]Status: Disposed28 Sept 2026AY 2018-19
- Rkkr Foundation, Chandigarh vs DCIT, Exemption Circle 1, ChandigarhITA 477/CHANDI/2024[2018-19]Status: Disposed28 Sept 2026AY 2018-19
- Imc Society of Iti Govt Central Crafts… vs Income Tax Officer, Exemption Ward…ITA 1850/CHANDI/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed24 Sept 2026AY 2017-18
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Ramesh K Devadiga And Ors vs. Khernagar Nandadeep Co-Operative Housing Society LTD And OrsBombay · 14 Oct 2026
- Permender Singh vs. Union Of INDIA And Ors.Calcutta · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Abdhish Dhal Samanta, Bhubaneswar vs. Chief Commissioner, CT And GST, Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Kniit Net Industries Private Limited, Khurda vs. Superintendent Of CGST And Central Excise, Bhubaneswar Ii CircleOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Maa Swarnapai Chemicals (Opc) Private Limited, Cuttack vs. Sales Tax Officer, Cuttack IOrissa · 14 Oct 2026