COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTIONS), DELHI vs. ICRW GROUP GRATUITY TRUST
What did the High Court hold?
The High Court admitted the appeals and framed questions of law regarding whether the ITAT correctly held the assessee's activities as charitable under Section 2(15) and if the ITAT erred in directing the CIT(E) to grant registration under Section 12AA.
What were the facts?
The Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions) filed appeals against the ITAT's decision regarding the charitable nature of the assessee trusts and the grant of registration. The appeals were admitted by the High Court after condoning a significant delay in re-filing.
What were the issues?
The key issues are whether the assessee's activities, primarily for discharging statutory gratuity liabilities, qualify as charitable under Section 2(15) and if the ITAT was correct in directing registration under Section 12AA despite separate provisions for gratuity fund approval.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
$~62, 63 & 65 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + ITA 35/2025 & CM APPL. 10063/2025 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTIONS), DELHI .....Appellant Through: Mr. Abhishek Maratha, SSC, Mr. Apoorv Agarwal, JSC, Mr. Parth Samwal, JSC, Ms. Nupur Sharma, Mr. Gaurav Singh, Mr. Bhanukaran Singh Jodha, Ms. Muskaan Goel and Mr. Kamakshraj Singh, Advocates. versus ICRW GROUP GRATUITY TRUST .....Respondent Through: Mr. Anand Chaudhuri and Mr. Kumail Abbas, Advocates. 63 + ITA 36/2025 & CM APPL. 10064/2025 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTIONS), DELHI .....Appellant Through: Mr. Abhishek Maratha, SSC, Mr. Apoorv Agarwal, JSC, Mr. Parth Samwal, JSC, Ms. Nupur Sharma, Mr. Gaurav Singh, Mr. Bhanukaran Singh Jodha, Ms. Muskaan Goel and Mr. Kamakshraj Singh, Advocates. versus ICLEI SOUTH ASIA GROUP GRATUITY TRUST .....Respondent Through: Mr. Anand Chaudhuri and Mr. Kumail Abbas, Advocates. 65 + ITA 38/2025 & CM APPL. 10149/2025 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTIONS), DELHI .....Appellant Through: Mr. Abhishek Maratha, SSC, This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 27/03/2026 at 12:31:16
Mr. Apoorv Agarwal, JSC, Mr. Parth Samwal, JSC, Ms. Nupur Sharma, Mr. Gaurav Singh, Mr. Bhanukaran Singh Jodha, Ms. Muskaan Goel and Mr. Kamakshraj Singh, Advocates. versus ICRW GROUP GRATUITY TRUST .....Respondent Through: Mr. Anand Chaudhuri and Mr. Kumail Abbas, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TUSHAR RAO GEDELA O R D E R %
19.02.2025 CM APPL. 10063/2025 in ITA 35/2025, CM APPL. 10064/2025 in ITA 36/2025 & CM APPL. 10149/2025 in ITA 38/2025 1. Having heard learned counsel representing the parties and perused the averments made in the instant applications, the applications are allowed and delay of 426 days in re-filing the appeals is condoned. 2. The applications stand disposed of.
ITA 35/2025, ITA 36/2025 & ITA 38/2025 3. After hearing Mr. Abhishek Maratha, Sr. Standing Counsel representing the appellant and Mr. Anand Chaudhuri, learned counsel representing the respondent, we admit the appeals and frame the following question of law which reads as under:- “A. Whether in the facts and circumstances of the case, the Hon'ble ITAT is correct in law by holding that the activity of the assessee is a charitable activity as per section 2(15) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 ignoring that the assessee trust has been created to discharge the statutory liability of making gratuity This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 27/03/2026 at 12:31:16
payments and not for general welfare of public at large? C. Whether in the facts and circumstances of the case, the Hon 'ble ITAT is correct in law by directed the CIT(E) to grant registration u/s 12AA ignoring that there are separate provisions in the Income Tax Act which governs the approval of gratuity funds under Rule 2(1) of the part 'C' of Fourth Schedule and the assessee may apply as per relevant provisions for approval?” 4. Issue notice to the respondent. Mr. Anand Chaudhuri, learned counsel for the respondent has put in appearance and accepts notice. 5. List for ‘hearing’ on 26.05.2025. DEVENDRA KUMAR UPADHYAYA, CJ TUSHAR RAO GEDELA, J FEBRUARY 19, 2025 mk This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 27/03/2026 at 12:31:16
More judgments on Section 2(15)
- Ss Early Learning Society, Hyderabad vs CIT (Exemption), HyderabadITA 1208/HYD/2025[2026-27]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2026-27
- Yashaswi Academy for Skills, Pune vs PCIT (Central), PuneITA 2448/PUN/2026[NA]Status: Disposed13 Oct 2026
- Yashaswi Academy for Skills, Pune vs PCIT (Central), PuneITA 2447/PUN/2026[NA]Status: Disposed13 Oct 2026
- Punjab Urban Planning and Development… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward 6(1), MohaliITA 636/CHANDI/2024[2021-22]Status: Disposed1 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
- Punjab Urban Planning and Development… vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle…ITA 635/CHANDI/2024[2017-18]Status: Disposed1 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S.Sri Satya Sai Constructions vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S. Sikka Motors PVT LTD vs. Union Of INDIA & Anr.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- Shri Yaras Suresh Babu Prabhu Kumar vs. The Union Of INDIATelangana · 27 Oct 2026
- Santa Singh vs. SuperintendentUttarakhand · 27 Oct 2026
- Azaad Builders vs. Assistant Commissioner SGSTUttarakhand · 27 Oct 2026