SKY HIGH II LEASING COMPANY LIMITED ,MUMBAI vs. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (INTERNATIONAL TAX) CIRCLE 4(2)(1), MUMBAI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the lease rentals are not taxable in India as per Article 8 of the India-Ireland DTAA, as the assessee does not have a PE in India. The penal interest for delayed payments is also not taxable in India as it is an integral part of the lease income taxable under Article 8.
What were the facts?
The assessee, an Irish company, leased aircraft to Indian airlines and earned rental income. The Assessing Officer treated this income as taxable in India, citing failure to meet the Principal Purpose Test (PPT) under the MLI and the existence of a Permanent Establishment (PE). The assessee also received penal interest for delayed lease payments.
What were the issues?
Whether aircraft lease rentals earned by an Irish company are taxable in India, and if penal interest for delayed payments is also taxable in India.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(12)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- Goetze (India) Ltd. v. CIT1,842 citing284 ITR 323 · 2006 · SC
- Union of India v. Azadi Bachao Andolan691 citing263 ITR 706 · 2003 · SC · Read judgment
- India Vs. Azadi Bachao Andolan 263 ITR 706 (SC); and Vodafone International Holdings B.V v. Union of India295 citing341 ITR 1 · 2012 · SC
- KOTAK MAHINDRA CO. LTD. AND ANOTHER. 367 50.(1987) 3 SCC 544: MADHAV AYAWADANRAO HOSKOT v. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA. 51250 citing10 SCC 1 · 2014 · SC
- Vodafone International Holdings BV v. Union of India216 citing6 SCC 613 · 2012 · SC
- (i) Formula One World Championship Ltd. v. CIT200 citing394 ITR 80 · 2017 · SC
- Gujarat Gas Company Ltd. v. JCIT99 citing245 ITR 84 · 2000 · HC
- CIT v. Shree Rajasthan Syntex Ltd.55 citing313 ITR 231 · 2009 · HC · Read judgment
- Milton Laminates Ltd. v. CIT50 citing37 Taxmann.com 249 · 2013 · HC
- CIT v. Bakelite Hylam Ltd.24 citing237 ITR 392 · 1999 · HC
- 165 Taxmann.com 3345 citing165 Taxmann.com 334 · 2024 · SC
- Tiger Global International III Holdings v. AAR5 citing468 ITR 405 · 2024 · HC
Heard together (3 matters)
Read from the judgment's own cause title. This page is filed under one of them.
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “I” BENCH, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI AMIT SHUKLA, JM & MS PADMAVATHY S, AM Sky High Lxxix Leasing Co. Ltd., The ACIT (IT), Circle-4(2)(1), Ireland, State outside India-D02 A342. Bandra Kurla Complex, PAN: ABFCS0570G Bandra (East), Mumbai-400051. Appellant) : Respondent)
Sky High XC Leasing Co. Ltd., The ACIT (IT), Circle-4(2)(1), Ireland, State outside India-D02 A342. Bandra Kurla Complex, PAN: ABFCS0570G Bandra (East), Mumbai-400051. Appellant) : Respondent)
Sky High LXXVIII Leasing Co.
The ACIT (IT), Circle-4(2)(1), Ireland, State outside India-D02 A342. Bandra (East), Mumbai-400051. PAN: ABFCS0570G Appellant) : Respondent
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
Similar judgments
Other orders that rely on the same authority or decide the same section.
- Sky High Lxxviii Leasing Company Limited… vs The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax…Mumbai6 Oct 2025Allowed
Also relies on CIT v. Bakelite Hylam Ltd. and 4 other authorities
The Tribunal held that the lease rentals are not taxable in India as per Article 8 of the India-Ireland DTAA, as the assessee does not have a PE in India. The penal interest for delayed payments is also not taxable in In...
- Ramalingam Ellalan, Erode vs ACIT, Central Circle-2, CoimbatoreChennai14 Oct 2025Partly Allowed
Also relies on CIT v. Bakelite Hylam Ltd. and 2 other authorities
The Tribunal held that the Rs 19,00,000 pertains to AY 2017-18 and cannot be taxed in AY 2018-19. The remaining Rs 18,70,000, representing payments made in AY 2018-19, should be taxed as business receipts at 30%.
- Eureka Forbes Ltd., Kolkata vs ACIT, RG-10, KolkataKolkata13 Apr 2018Partly Allowed
Also relies on CIT v. Bakelite Hylam Ltd. and 2 other authorities
The Tribunal held that no disallowance of interest under Rule 8D(2)(ii) could be made as the assessee had sufficient own funds for investments. For disallowance under Rule 8D(2)(iii), only dividend-bearing investments sh...
- JCIT, (OSD), Cir-8(1), Kolkata vs M/S Hi-Tech Systems & Services Ltd., KolkataKolkata7 Mar 2018Partly Allowed
Also relies on CIT v. Bakelite Hylam Ltd. and 2 other authorities
The Tribunal held that depreciation is mandatorily granted irrespective of the claim and thus allowed depreciation for the earlier assessment years. However, it upheld the rejection of allowing losses in rectification pr...
- Dae (Sabs) 10296 Ireland Designated… vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax (Int…Mumbai13 Aug 2025Allowed
Also relies on CIT v. Shree Rajasthan Syntex Ltd. and 1 other authority
The Tribunal held that the assessments were not barred by limitation and that the DRP's directions did not exceed its jurisdiction. Crucially, the Tribunal ruled in favour of the assessees on the core issue of taxability...
More judgments on Section 9(1)(vi)
- Ahaguru Education Technology Private… vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 1993/CHNY/2026[2023-24]Status: Disposed23 Sept 2026AY 2023-24
- Slack Technologies Limited, Mumbai vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 979/MUM/2025[2022-23]Status: Disposed15 Sept 2026AY 2022-23
- Slack Technologies Limited, Mumbai vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 4310/MUM/2023[2021-22]Status: Disposed15 Sept 2026AY 2021-22
- Atos Information Technology (Singapore) Pte… vs DCIT, (Internation Taxation) Circle…ITA 6745/MUM/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed7 Sept 2026AY 2018-19
- Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi vs Times Content Limited( Now Known As Times…ITA 5333/DEL/2024[2018-19]Status: Disposed3 Sept 2026AY 2018-19
Latest GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Ankil Jagdishchandra Kholwadwala vs. Union Of INDIA And AnrBombay · 22 Oct 2026
- Imtiyaz Shaikh Z Chorlekar vs. Salman ShaikhBombay · 21 Oct 2026
- S. Nithyananda vs. State Of KarnatakaKarnataka · 17 Oct 2026
- Venkadeswara Grill Works vs. The Joint Commissioner (St)Madras · 16 Oct 2026
- Mufti Clothing And Co vs. The Assistant Commissioner (St)Madras · 16 Oct 2026