PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX -12 vs. MRS. JAYANTI DALMIA

PDF · subscribers
ITA - 288 / 2023HC Delhi18 May 20233 pages
For Petitioner: RUCHIR BHATIA
AI SummaryPartly Allowed

What did the High Court hold?

The Delhi High Court condoned the delay in filing and re-filing the appeals. The appeals were ordered to be tagged with other connected appeals for further proceedings.

What were the facts?

The Revenue filed appeals before the Delhi High Court with significant delays. The appeals challenged orders passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal for AY 2006-07 and 2007-08.

What were the issues?

The primary issue was the delay in filing the appeals by the Revenue. The court also noted the pendency of connected appeals involving related parties.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

N/A

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

$~35 & 36 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + ITA 287/2023

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX -12 ..... Appellant Through: Mr Ruchir Bhatia, Sr. Standing Counsel with Mr Pratyaksh Gupta, Jr. Standing Counsel.

versus

JAYANTI DALMIA

..... Respondent

Through: None.

+ ITA 288/2023

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX -12 ..... Appellant Through: Mr Ruchir Bhatia, Sr. Standing Counsel with Mr Pratyaksh Gupta, Jr. Standing Counsel.

versus

MRS. JAYANTI DALMIA

..... Respondent

Through: None.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER

HON'BLE MR JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA

O R D E R %

18.05.2023 [Physical Hearing/Hybrid Hearing (as per request)] CM No. 26072/2023 in ITA 288/2023 [Application filed on behalf of the appellant seeking condonation of delay of 80 days in filing the appeal] CM No. 26013/2023 in ITA 287/2023 [Application filed on behalf of the appellant seeking condonation of delay of 160 days in re-filing the appeal] CM No. 26073/2023 in ITA 288/2023 [Application filed on behalf of the appellant seeking condonation of delay of 180 days in re-filing the appeal] 1. These are applications moved on behalf of the appellant/revenue seeking condonation of delay in filing and re-filing the appeals. ITA 287/2023 & connected appeal

page 1 of 3 This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 27/03/2026 at 14:02:51

1.1 According to the appellant/revenue, there is a delay of 80 days in filing ITA 288/2023, and a delay of 160 and 180 days in re-filing ITA 287/2023 and ITA 288/2023, respectively. 2. For the reasons given in the applications, the delay in filing and re- filing the appeals is condoned. 3. The applications are disposed of. 4. The registry will dispatch a copy of this order to the respondent/assessee. 5. In case the respondent/assessee has any objection, she will have liberty to approach the court for variation of the order. ITA 287/2023 ITA 288/2023 6. These are appeals concerning Assessment Year (AY) 2006-07 (in ITA 287/2023) and 2007-08 (in ITA 288/2023). 7. Challenge is laid to the orders dated 16.06.2022 (in ITA 287/2023) and 07.02.2022 (in ITA 288/2023) passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal [in short, “the Tribunal”]. 8. We are informed that in a connected appeal concerning the husband of the respondent/assessee, the question of law has been framed. This appeal, we are told, is numbered as ITA 775/2018, titled The Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax – (Central)-3 v. Anurag Dalmia. 8.1 Besides this, we are told that the other connected appeal is ITA 740/2018, titled Parag Dalmia v. Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle – 1 & Anr. 9. The registry will tag the above-captioned appeals with ITA 775/2018. ITA 287/2023 & connected appeal

page 2 of 3 This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 27/03/2026 at 14:02:51

10.

It appears that the above-mentioned appeals are in the regular category. Therefore, these appeals will also be placed on the regular board, along with the said appeals.

RAJIV SHAKDHER, J

GIRISH KATHPALIA, J

MAY 18, 2023 / tr

Click here to check corrigendum, if any

ITA 287/2023 & connected appeal

page 3 of 3

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 27/03/2026 at 14:02:51

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →