DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE - 2, GUWAHATI vs. SHRI JITENDRA NEWATIA, GUWAHATI
In favour of the assessee: the Revenue's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal declined to hear the appeal as the tax effect was below the prescribed threshold limit of ₹50 lac as per CBDT Circular No.17/2019. The Assessing Officer was permitted to seek rectification if the tax effect computation was irregular.
What were the facts?
The Revenue filed an appeal against the CIT(A)'s order concerning assessment year 2012-13. The net tax involved in the appeal was ₹46,55,555.
What were the issues?
Whether the appeal should be admitted when the tax effect is below the prescribed monetary limit for appeals.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, GAUHATI BENCH “E” COURT AT KOLKATA
Before: Shri S.S.Godara & Dr. A.L.Saini
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL GAUHATI BENCH “E” COURT AT KOLKATA Before Shri S.S.Godara, Judicial Member and Dr. A.L.Saini, Accountant Member ITA No.215/Gau/2017 Assessment Year :2012-13
DCIT, Circle-2, V/s. Shri Jitendra Newatia Guwahati, 5thFloor, Prathna, Nr. Jesuit Aayakar Bhawan, House, Pani Tank, Jahak G.S. Road, Guwahati- Ghat, Uzanbazar, Guwhti- 781005 781001 [PAN No.AAWPN 1133 H] .. अपीलाथ� /Appellant ��यथ�/Respondent
Shri M.C Omi Ningshen, JCIT SR-DR अपीलाथ� क� ओर से/By Appellant Shri Uttam Kumar Bor Thakur, Advocate ��यथ� क� ओर से/By Respondent 11-12-2019 सुनवाई क� तार�ख/Date of Hearing 18-12-2019 घोषणा क� तार�ख/Date of Pronouncement आदेश /O R D E R PER BEMCH:- This Revenue’s appeal for assessment year 2012-13 arises against the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-1 Guwahati’s order dated 30.06.2018 passed in case No.Guwa-6/2015 involving proceedings u/s 144 r.w.s. 153A of the Income Tax Act, 1961; in short ‘the Act’.
It transpires during the course of hearing that net tax involved in the instant appeal of ₹46,55,555/- only i.e. less than the prescribed threshold limit of ₹50 lac in CBDT’s latest Circular No.17/2019 dated 08.08.2019. We therefore decline instant appeal for this precise reason.
ITA No.232/Gau/2018 Assessment Year: 2010-11 ITO Wd-4(2), Guwa Vs. M/s Kishlay Foods Pvt. Ltd. Page 2 It is made clear that in case the above computation of tax effect suffers from any irregularity, it shall be very much open for the Assessing Officer to seek necessary rectification as per law.
This Revenue’s appeal is dismissed in above terms. Order pronounced in the open court 18/12/2019 Sd/- Sd/- (A.L.Saini) (S.S.Godara) (Accountant Member) Judicial Member) Kolkata, *Dkp �दनांकः- 18/12/2019 कोलकाता/। आदेश क� ��त�ल�प अ�े�षत / Copy of Order Forwarded to:- 1. अपीलाथ�/Appellant-ITO ward-4(2), 5th Fl, Aayakar Bhawan, G.S. Road, Guwahati-05 2. ��यथ� /Respondent-M/s Kishlay Foods Pvt. Ltd.Dewan Patty, Fancy Bazar,Guwahati-001 3. संबं*धत आयकर आयु-त / Concerned CIT Guwahati 4. आयकर आयु-त- अपील / CIT (A) Guwahati 5. 0वभागीय �3त3न*ध, आयकर अपील�य अ*धकरण, / DR, ITAT, Guwahati 6. गाड7 फाइल / Guard file. By order/आदेश से, /True Copy/ Sr. Private Secretary, Head of Office/DDO आयकर अपील�य अ*धकरण, गूवाहाठ� ।
More judgments on Section 153A
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Ashok Singh, Jaipur vs ACIT, Circle-2 Jaipur, JaipurITA 1540/JPR/2025[2015-16]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Central… vs Ig3 Infra Limited, KanchipuramITA 2578/CHNY/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Central… vs Ig3 Infra Limited, OggiamthoraipakkaITA 2577/CHNY/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Central… vs Shanmugham Thiagarajan, ChennaiITA 2576/CHNY/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Sita Enterprises vs. Office Of The CommissionerUttarakhand · 26 Oct 2026
- Capri Global Capital LTD Through Represented By Its Law Officer Mr. Varun Kaljoria vs. The State Of Madhya Pradesh Through Principal SecretaryMadhya Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026
- Sri Tatiparthy Venkata Swamy vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 25 Oct 2026
- Piyush Shantilal Veera vs. State Of U.P.Allahabad · 23 Oct 2026
- Tvl. Pooja Shri Traders vs. The Deputy State Tax Officer - 1Madras · 23 Oct 2026