M/S ROBUST TRANSPORTATION PRIVATE LIMITED,MUMBAI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 15(3)(1), MUMBAI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the addition of notional interest was unsustainable as the assessee had sufficient interest-free funds to cover the advances and no borrowed funds were utilized. The doctrine of real income prevents taxing hypothetical income that has not accrued.
What were the facts?
The assessee company, which had not yet commenced its main business, gave interest-free loans and advances totaling ₹21.71 crore to certain entities. The Assessing Officer (AO) added notional interest of ₹1.73 crore to the assessee's income, presuming the advances were made from borrowed funds.
What were the issues?
Whether notional interest can be taxed on interest-free advances when the assessee has sufficient interest-free funds and no borrowed funds were used. Whether the doctrine of real income applies to prevent taxation of hypothetical income.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(2)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- CIT v. Shoorji Vallabhdas & Co.551 citing46 ITR 144 · 1962 · SC
- Additionally, in CIT v. A. Raman & Co.321 citing67 ITR 11 · 1968 · SC
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘D’ BENCH
PER AMIT SHUKLA (J.M): This appeal, being ITA No. 4803/Mum/2025, has been filed by the assessee against the order dated 16 June 2025 passed by the National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi, arising from the assessment framed under section 143(3) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 for Assessment Year 2017–18. The solitary and central grievance of the assessee is against the sustenance of an addition of ₹1,73,68,000 made by the Assessing Officer by way of notional interest @ 8% on 2 Robust Transportation Pvt. Ltd., aggregate loans and advances of ₹21,71,00,000 given by the assessee-company to certain entities during the relevant previous year. According to the asse
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Tvl. Jeyarani Shopping Centre vs. The Deputy State Tax Officer -1/The Deputy Commercial Tax OfficerMadras · 14 Oct 2026
- Rohan Tanna vs. Directorate General Of Goods And Services Tax IntelligenceChhattisgarh · 14 Oct 2026
- Dipak Saikia vs. The Union Of INDIA And 4 OrsGauhati · 14 Oct 2026
- Saraswati Phukan vs. The Union Of INDIA And 4 OrsGauhati · 14 Oct 2026
- Sanjay Maheshwari vs. Union Of INDIA & Ors.Delhi · 14 Oct 2026